Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- Kepler-122Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-122 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-122 cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-122 dDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-122 eDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-122 fDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1220Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1220 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1221Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1221 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1222Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1222 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1223Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1223 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1224Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1224 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1225Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1225 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1226Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1226 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1227Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1227 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1228Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1228 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1229Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1229bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-123Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-123 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-123 cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1230Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1230 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1231Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1231 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1232Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1232 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1233Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1233 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1234Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1234 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1235Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1235 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1236Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1236 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1237Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1237 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1238Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1238 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1239Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1239 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-124Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.