Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- Kepler-1988 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1989Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1989 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-199Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-199 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-199 cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1990Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1990 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1990 cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1991Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1991 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1991 cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1992Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1992 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1993Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1993 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1994Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1994bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1995Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1995 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1996Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1996 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1996 cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1997Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1997 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1998Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1998bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-1999Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-1999 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-19bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-19cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-20Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-20 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-20 cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-20 dDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-20 eDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-20 fDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-200Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-200 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-200 cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-2000Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-2000 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-2000 cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-2001Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-2001 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-2001 cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-2003bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-201Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-201 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-201 cDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.