Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- Kepler-9 dDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-90Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-90 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-90 cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-90 dDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-90 eDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-90 fDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-90 gDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-900Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-900 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-901Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-901 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-902Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-902 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-903Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-903 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-903 cDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-904Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-904 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-905Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-905 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-906Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-906 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-907Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-907 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-908Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-908 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-909Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-909 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-90hDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-90iDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-91Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-91 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-910Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-910 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-911Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-911 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-912Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-912 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-913Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-913 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-914Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-914 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-915Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-915 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-916Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-916 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-917Deep Cut85points
- Kepler-917 bDeep Cut85points
- Kepler-918Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.