Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- Mercer 81-2Deep Cut85points
- MergaDeep Cut85points
- MeridianaDeep Cut85points
- MeropeDeep Cut85points
- Merope NebulaDeep Cut85points
- MesarthimDeep Cut85points
- Messier 10Deep Cut85points
- Messier 100Deep Cut85points
- Messier 103Deep Cut85points
- Messier 105Deep Cut85points
- Messier 106Deep Cut85points
- Messier 107Deep Cut85points
- Messier 109Deep Cut85points
- Messier 110Deep Cut85points
- Messier 12Deep Cut85points
- Messier 14Deep Cut85points
- Messier 15Deep Cut85points
- Messier 18Deep Cut85points
- Messier 19Deep Cut85points
- Messier 2Deep Cut85points
- Messier 21Deep Cut85points
- Messier 22Deep Cut85points
- Messier 23Deep Cut85points
- Messier 25Deep Cut85points
- Messier 26Deep Cut85points
- Messier 28Deep Cut85points
- Messier 29Deep Cut85points
- Messier 3Deep Cut85points
- Messier 30Deep Cut85points
- Messier 32Deep Cut85points
- Messier 34Deep Cut85points
- Messier 35Deep Cut85points
- Messier 36Deep Cut85points
- Messier 37Deep Cut85points
- Messier 39Deep Cut85points
- Messier 4Deep Cut85points
- Messier 41Deep Cut85points
- Messier 46Deep Cut85points
- Messier 47Deep Cut85points
- Messier 48Deep Cut85points
- Messier 49Deep Cut85points
- Messier 5Deep Cut85points
- Messier 50Deep Cut85points
- Messier 52Deep Cut85points
- Messier 53Deep Cut85points
- Messier 54Deep Cut85points
- Messier 55Deep Cut85points
- Messier 56Deep Cut85points
- Messier 58Deep Cut85points
- Messier 59Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.