Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- NGC 117Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1171Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1172Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1174Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1175Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1177Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1179Deep Cut85points
- NGC 118Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1180Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1181Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1182Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1184Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1185Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1187Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1188Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1189Deep Cut85points
- NGC 119Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1190Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1191Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1192Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1193Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1194Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1195Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1196Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1198Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1199Deep Cut85points
- NGC 12Deep Cut85points
- NGC 120Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1200Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1201Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1202Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1203Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1203ADeep Cut85points
- NGC 1203BDeep Cut85points
- NGC 1204Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1206Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1207Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1208Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1209Deep Cut85points
- NGC 121Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1210Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1211Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1212Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1213Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1214Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1215Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1216Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1217Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1218Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1219Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.