Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- NGC 1560Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1561Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1562Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1563Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1564Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1565Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1566Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1567Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1568Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1569Deep Cut85points
- NGC 157Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1570Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1572Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1573Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1574Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1575Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1576Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1578Deep Cut85points
- NGC 158Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1580Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1581Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1582Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1583Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1584Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1585Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1586Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1587Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1588Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1589Deep Cut85points
- NGC 159Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1590Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1591Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1592Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1593Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1594Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1595Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1596Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1597Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1598Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1599Deep Cut85points
- NGC 16Deep Cut85points
- NGC 160Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1600Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1601Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1602Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1603Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1604Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1605Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1606Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1607Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.