Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- NGC 1799Deep Cut85points
- NGC 18Deep Cut85points
- NGC 180Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1800Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1801Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1802Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1803Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1804Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1805Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1806Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1807Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1808Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1809Deep Cut85points
- NGC 181Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1810Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1811Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1812Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1813Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1814Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1815Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1816Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1817Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1818Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1819Deep Cut85points
- NGC 182Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1820Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1821Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1822Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1823Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1824Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1825Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1826Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1827Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1828Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1829Deep Cut85points
- NGC 183Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1830Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1831Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1832Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1833Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1834Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1836Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1837Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1838Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1839Deep Cut85points
- NGC 184Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1840Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1842Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1843Deep Cut85points
- NGC 1844Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.