Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- NGC 2594Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2595Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2596Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2598Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2599Deep Cut85points
- NGC 26Deep Cut85points
- NGC 260Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2600Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2601Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2602Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2603Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2604Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2604BDeep Cut85points
- NGC 2605Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2606Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2607Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2608Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2609Deep Cut85points
- NGC 261Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2610Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2611Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2612Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2613Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2614Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2615Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2616Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2617Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2618Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2619Deep Cut85points
- NGC 262Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2620Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2621Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2622Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2623Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2624Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2625Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2626Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2627Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2628Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2629Deep Cut85points
- NGC 263Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2633Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2634Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2634ADeep Cut85points
- NGC 2635Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2636Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2637Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2638Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2639Deep Cut85points
- NGC 264Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.