Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- NGC 3023Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3024Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3025Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3026Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3027Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3028Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3029Deep Cut85points
- NGC 303Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3030Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3032Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3033Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3035Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3036Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3037Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3038Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3039Deep Cut85points
- NGC 304Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3040Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3041Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3042Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3043Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3044Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3045Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3047Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3047ADeep Cut85points
- NGC 3047BDeep Cut85points
- NGC 3048Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3049Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3051Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3052Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3053Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3054Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3055Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3056Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3057Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3058Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3059Deep Cut85points
- NGC 306Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3060Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3061Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3062Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3064Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3065Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3066Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3067Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3068Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3069Deep Cut85points
- NGC 307Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3070Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3071Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.