Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- NGC 3647Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3648Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3649Deep Cut85points
- NGC 365Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3650Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3651Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3652Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3653Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3654Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3655Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3656Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3657Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3658Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3659Deep Cut85points
- NGC 366Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3660Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3661Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3662Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3663Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3664Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3664ADeep Cut85points
- NGC 3665Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3666Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3667Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3667ADeep Cut85points
- NGC 3668Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3669Deep Cut85points
- NGC 367Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3670Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3671Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3672Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3673Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3674Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3675Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3676Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3677Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3678Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3679Deep Cut85points
- NGC 368Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3680Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3681Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3682Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3683Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3683ADeep Cut85points
- NGC 3684Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3685Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3686Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3687Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3688Deep Cut85points
- NGC 3689Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.