Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- AO CassiopeiaeDeep Cut85points
- AO MensaeDeep Cut85points
- AO SerpentisDeep Cut85points
- AP ColumbaeDeep Cut85points
- AP LibraeDeep Cut85points
- ApamvatsaDeep Cut85points
- ApduDeep Cut85points
- ApepDeep Cut85points
- APM 08279+5255Deep Cut85points
- Aquarius B SuperclusterDeep Cut85points
- Aquarius DwarfDeep Cut85points
- Aquarius IIDeep Cut85points
- Aquarius IIIDeep Cut85points
- Aquarius IVDeep Cut85points
- Aquarius StreamDeep Cut85points
- Aquarius SuperclusterDeep Cut85points
- Aquarius-Capricornus SuperclusterDeep Cut85points
- Aquarius-Cetus SuperclusterDeep Cut85points
- Aquila SuperclusterDeep Cut85points
- AR AndromedaeDeep Cut85points
- AR AurigaeDeep Cut85points
- AR CassiopeiaeDeep Cut85points
- AR CepheiDeep Cut85points
- AR LacertaeDeep Cut85points
- AR ScorpiiDeep Cut85points
- ArberDeep Cut85points
- ArcalísDeep Cut85points
- ArcerioDeep Cut85points
- Arches ClusterDeep Cut85points
- Arches-F9Deep Cut85points
- Arcturus moving groupDeep Cut85points
- Argo DwarfDeep Cut85points
- Argus associationDeep Cut85points
- Arin-majlepDeep Cut85points
- ArionDeep Cut85points
- Ark 120Deep Cut85points
- Arkab PosteriorDeep Cut85points
- Arkab PriorDeep Cut85points
- ArkasDeep Cut85points
- ArnebDeep Cut85points
- Arp 102BDeep Cut85points
- Arp 107Deep Cut85points
- Arp 143Deep Cut85points
- Arp 146Deep Cut85points
- Arp 147Deep Cut85points
- Arp 151Deep Cut85points
- Arp 187Deep Cut85points
- Arp 2Deep Cut85points
- Arp 220Deep Cut85points
- Arp 251Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.