Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- Eta2 FornacisDeep Cut85points
- Eta2 HydriDeep Cut85points
- Eta2 PictorisDeep Cut85points
- Eta3 FornacisDeep Cut85points
- ETHOS 1Deep Cut85points
- EU AndromedaeDeep Cut85points
- EU TauriDeep Cut85points
- EV CarinaeDeep Cut85points
- EV LacertaeDeep Cut85points
- EW AquariiDeep Cut85points
- EW LacertaeDeep Cut85points
- EX HydraeDeep Cut85points
- EX LupiDeep Cut85points
- Exclamation Mark GalaxyDeep Cut85points
- Exposed Cranium NebulaDeep Cut85points
- EyekeDeep Cut85points
- Eyes GalaxiesDeep Cut85points
- EZ AquariiDeep Cut85points
- EZ Canis MajorisDeep Cut85points
- F CentauriDeep Cut85points
- F HydraeDeep Cut85points
- F200DB-045Deep Cut85points
- F6D1Deep Cut85points
- F8D1Deep Cut85points
- FafnirDeep Cut85points
- Fairall 9Deep Cut85points
- Fairy of Eagle NebulaDeep Cut85points
- FangDeep Cut85points
- FawarisDeep Cut85points
- FBQ 0951+2635Deep Cut85points
- Feather on the HatDeep Cut85points
- Feige 55Deep Cut85points
- FelisDeep Cut85points
- FelixvarelaDeep Cut85points
- FenmuDeep Cut85points
- Fermi bubblesDeep Cut85points
- Ferrero 54Deep Cut85points
- Fetus NebulaDeep Cut85points
- FF AndromedaeDeep Cut85points
- FF AquilaeDeep Cut85points
- FG SagittaeDeep Cut85points
- FG VirginisDeep Cut85points
- FH SerpentisDeep Cut85points
- FiletdorDeep Cut85points
- Fimbulthul streamDeep Cut85points
- Finger of God GlobuleDeep Cut85points
- FinlayDeep Cut85points
- Firework NebulaDeep Cut85points
- Fireworks GalaxyDeep Cut85points
- Fish Head NebulaDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.