Krillion Recorded answers
2,242 recorded answers
How to approach it
Sweep disciplines one at a time instead of chasing synonyms for the clue in brackets, since breadth is what pays. The productive question is which standard figure in a given trade is habitually written with a percent sign and not as a fraction, a decimal or a count. Money, clinical research, sports analytics, farming, factory quality and social surveys each hold long tails of such measures, and the tail is where the points sit. Inside a chosen field, drill from the obvious headline number down to the specialist variants that practitioners quote and outsiders never mention. Jot candidates in bulk before judging them: the middle band is crowded, and only unusual entries lift a solid list into a great one.
Get a hint
Begin with the professional vocabularies, because money, clinical research, engineering and sports analytics each keep a stock of figures quoted with a percent sign rather than as a plain fraction.
A little more
Then turn to social and household statistics, where coverage, participation, uptake and completion are almost always given as a share of a clearly defined population.
One step further
Finally probe narrow technical corners, where one specialised ratio, loss or content figure is second nature inside a trade and practically unknown beyond it.
Reveal answers 2,242
- Estate taxDeep Cut85points
- Ethnic compositionDeep Cut85points
- Euploidy rateDeep Cut85points
- EuriborDeep Cut85points
- Evaporative purgeDeep Cut85points
- Event-free survivalDeep Cut85points
- Excess airDeep Cut85points
- Excess mortality (P-score)Deep Cut85points
- Excess returnDeep Cut85points
- Excess weight lossDeep Cut85points
- Exchangeable sodium percentageDeep Cut85points
- Excise taxDeep Cut85points
- Exclusive breastfeeding rateDeep Cut85points
- Executor feeDeep Cut85points
- Exercise intensityDeep Cut85points
- Exit rateDeep Cut85points
- Expected completion percentageDeep Cut85points
- Expected goals percentageDeep Cut85points
- Expected returnDeep Cut85points
- Expense loadDeep Cut85points
- Expense ratioDeep Cut85points
- Expense ratio (insurance)Deep Cut85points
- Experimental event rateDeep Cut85points
- Explained variance ratioDeep Cut85points
- Explosive play rateDeep Cut85points
- Export taxDeep Cut85points
- Exports as a share of GDPDeep Cut85points
- External debt to GNIDeep Cut85points
- Extra bases taken percentageDeep Cut85points
- Extra point percentageDeep Cut85points
- Extra-base hit percentageDeep Cut85points
- Extraction yieldDeep Cut85points
- Extreme poverty rateDeep Cut85points
- Fabric stretchDeep Cut85points
- Faceoff percentageDeep Cut85points
- Facility birth rateDeep Cut85points
- Faculty with doctoratesDeep Cut85points
- Faculty with terminal degreesDeep Cut85points
- Failure of passive transfer rateDeep Cut85points
- Failure-to-appear rateDeep Cut85points
- Fair catch percentageDeep Cut85points
- Fairways hitDeep Cut85points
- Fake follower percentageDeep Cut85points
- False discovery rateDeep Cut85points
- False negative rateDeep Cut85points
- False omission rateDeep Cut85points
- False positive rateDeep Cut85points
- Family-wise error rateDeep Cut85points
- Fan efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- Fan speedDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Points fall as more players choose the same entry, so the reveal reads as a map of consensus rather than a test of knowledge. Broad, instantly reachable measures sit at the bottom of the top band: 300 recorded answers earned 60 points, meaning plenty of people converged on the same handful of headline figures. A vast middle tier of 1836 answers earned 85, and that list shows what separates it from the floor: precision inside a field rather than celebrity. Entries such as a mutual fund distribution charge (12b-1 fee, 85), a short-term euro area lending benchmark (€STR, 85) or a post-procedure death rate (30-day mortality, 85) are professional terms rather than general knowledge, yet still familiar enough to be shared by a few players. Abandonment rate (85) lands in the same tier for the same reason. The lone 100-point entry, Albedo, was matched by nobody else, which is the lesson: the summit belongs to one narrow technical reading of the prompt that no rival tried.