Recorded answers
2,242 recorded answers
How to approach it
Sweep disciplines one at a time instead of chasing synonyms for the clue in brackets, since breadth is what pays. The productive question is which standard figure in a given trade is habitually written with a percent sign and not as a fraction, a decimal or a count. Money, clinical research, sports analytics, farming, factory quality and social surveys each hold long tails of such measures, and the tail is where the points sit. Inside a chosen field, drill from the obvious headline number down to the specialist variants that practitioners quote and outsiders never mention. Jot candidates in bulk before judging them: the middle band is crowded, and only unusual entries lift a solid list into a great one.
Get a hint
Begin with the professional vocabularies, because money, clinical research, engineering and sports analytics each keep a stock of figures quoted with a percent sign rather than as a plain fraction.
A little more
Then turn to social and household statistics, where coverage, participation, uptake and completion are almost always given as a share of a clearly defined population.
One step further
Finally probe narrow technical corners, where one specialised ratio, loss or content figure is second nature inside a trade and practically unknown beyond it.
Reveal answers 2,242
- Neanderthal DNADeep Cut85points
- NEET rateDeep Cut85points
- Negative predictive valueDeep Cut85points
- Net exposureDeep Cut85points
- Net foreign liabilities to GDPDeep Cut85points
- Net intake rate in grade 1Deep Cut85points
- Net interest marginDeep Cut85points
- Net investment income taxDeep Cut85points
- Net points wonDeep Cut85points
- Net production efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- Net revenue retentionDeep Cut85points
- Net sentimentDeep Cut85points
- Net stable funding ratioDeep Cut85points
- Netflix matchDeep Cut85points
- Network utilizationDeep Cut85points
- Neutral detergent fiberDeep Cut85points
- Neutral interest rateDeep Cut85points
- Neutrophil percentageDeep Cut85points
- Nitrogen contentDeep Cut85points
- Nitrogen use efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- Nitrox oxygen percentageDeep Cut85points
- No-show rateDeep Cut85points
- Noise amountDeep Cut85points
- Nominal interest rateDeep Cut85points
- Non-performing loan ratioDeep Cut85points
- Non-return rateDeep Cut85points
- Non-revenue waterDeep Cut85points
- Nonresponse rateDeep Cut85points
- Note probabilityDeep Cut85points
- Nuclear share of electricityDeep Cut85points
- Numeracy rateDeep Cut85points
- Occupancy cost ratioDeep Cut85points
- Ocean exploration percentageDeep Cut85points
- Offensive rebound percentageDeep Cut85points
- Offensive zone start percentageDeep Cut85points
- Offer acceptance rateDeep Cut85points
- Oil saturationDeep Cut85points
- Oleic acid contentDeep Cut85points
- Olive oil acidityDeep Cut85points
- OmnivampDeep Cut85points
- On-target percentageDeep Cut85points
- On-time deliveryDeep Cut85points
- On-time performanceDeep Cut85points
- One-putt percentageDeep Cut85points
- Onside kick recovery rateDeep Cut85points
- Open defecation rateDeep Cut85points
- Open rateDeep Cut85points
- OpenCritic % Critics RecommendDeep Cut85points
- Openness factorDeep Cut85points
- Operating cash flow marginDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Points fall as more players choose the same entry, so the reveal reads as a map of consensus rather than a test of knowledge. Broad, instantly reachable measures sit at the bottom of the top band: 300 recorded answers earned 60 points, meaning plenty of people converged on the same handful of headline figures. A vast middle tier of 1836 answers earned 85, and that list shows what separates it from the floor: precision inside a field rather than celebrity. Entries such as a mutual fund distribution charge (12b-1 fee, 85), a short-term euro area lending benchmark (€STR, 85) or a post-procedure death rate (30-day mortality, 85) are professional terms rather than general knowledge, yet still familiar enough to be shared by a few players. Abandonment rate (85) lands in the same tier for the same reason. The lone 100-point entry, Albedo, was matched by nobody else, which is the lesson: the summit belongs to one narrow technical reading of the prompt that no rival tried.