Recorded answers
2,242 recorded answers
How to approach it
Sweep disciplines one at a time instead of chasing synonyms for the clue in brackets, since breadth is what pays. The productive question is which standard figure in a given trade is habitually written with a percent sign and not as a fraction, a decimal or a count. Money, clinical research, sports analytics, farming, factory quality and social surveys each hold long tails of such measures, and the tail is where the points sit. Inside a chosen field, drill from the obvious headline number down to the specialist variants that practitioners quote and outsiders never mention. Jot candidates in bulk before judging them: the middle band is crowded, and only unusual entries lift a solid list into a great one.
Get a hint
Begin with the professional vocabularies, because money, clinical research, engineering and sports analytics each keep a stock of figures quoted with a percent sign rather than as a plain fraction.
A little more
Then turn to social and household statistics, where coverage, participation, uptake and completion are almost always given as a share of a clearly defined population.
One step further
Finally probe narrow technical corners, where one specialised ratio, loss or content figure is second nature inside a trade and practically unknown beyond it.
Reveal answers 2,242
- ARM marginDeep Cut85points
- Armed forces share of labor forceDeep Cut85points
- Armor penetrationDeep Cut85points
- Arrangement feeDeep Cut85points
- Arterial stenosisDeep Cut85points
- Ash contentDeep Cut85points
- Aspect ratio (tire)Deep Cut85points
- Asphalt contentDeep Cut85points
- Assessment ratioDeep Cut85points
- Asset allocationDeep Cut85points
- Assimilation efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- Assist percentageDeep Cut85points
- Assist-to-pass percentageDeep Cut85points
- Assumption feeDeep Cut85points
- Asylum denial rateDeep Cut85points
- Asylum grant rateDeep Cut85points
- Asymptomatic carriage rateDeep Cut85points
- Asymptomatic rateDeep Cut85points
- Atmospheric compositionDeep Cut85points
- Atom economyDeep Cut85points
- Atom percentDeep Cut85points
- ATS cover percentageDeep Cut85points
- Attach rateDeep Cut85points
- Attachment pointDeep Cut85points
- Attack percentageDeep Cut85points
- Attack rateDeep Cut85points
- Attack speedDeep Cut85points
- Attributable fraction among the exposedDeep Cut85points
- Attrition rateDeep Cut85points
- Audience retentionDeep Cut85points
- Audience scoreDeep Cut85points
- Audience shareDeep Cut85points
- Auto loan rateDeep Cut85points
- AvailabilityDeep Cut85points
- Average annual growth rateDeep Cut85points
- Avoidance (WoW)Deep Cut85points
- Backorder rateDeep Cut85points
- Bad throw percentageDeep Cut85points
- Bail bond premiumDeep Cut85points
- Bail rateDeep Cut85points
- Baker's percentageDeep Cut85points
- Balance transfer feeDeep Cut85points
- Balanced accuracyDeep Cut85points
- Ball percentageDeep Cut85points
- Ballot rejection rateDeep Cut85points
- Ban rateDeep Cut85points
- Band neutrophilsDeep Cut85points
- Baron control percentageDeep Cut85points
- Barrel rateDeep Cut85points
- Base saturationDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Points fall as more players choose the same entry, so the reveal reads as a map of consensus rather than a test of knowledge. Broad, instantly reachable measures sit at the bottom of the top band: 300 recorded answers earned 60 points, meaning plenty of people converged on the same handful of headline figures. A vast middle tier of 1836 answers earned 85, and that list shows what separates it from the floor: precision inside a field rather than celebrity. Entries such as a mutual fund distribution charge (12b-1 fee, 85), a short-term euro area lending benchmark (€STR, 85) or a post-procedure death rate (30-day mortality, 85) are professional terms rather than general knowledge, yet still familiar enough to be shared by a few players. Abandonment rate (85) lands in the same tier for the same reason. The lone 100-point entry, Albedo, was matched by nobody else, which is the lesson: the summit belongs to one narrow technical reading of the prompt that no rival tried.