Krillion Recorded answers
2,242 recorded answers
How to approach it
Sweep disciplines one at a time instead of chasing synonyms for the clue in brackets, since breadth is what pays. The productive question is which standard figure in a given trade is habitually written with a percent sign and not as a fraction, a decimal or a count. Money, clinical research, sports analytics, farming, factory quality and social surveys each hold long tails of such measures, and the tail is where the points sit. Inside a chosen field, drill from the obvious headline number down to the specialist variants that practitioners quote and outsiders never mention. Jot candidates in bulk before judging them: the middle band is crowded, and only unusual entries lift a solid list into a great one.
Get a hint
Begin with the professional vocabularies, because money, clinical research, engineering and sports analytics each keep a stock of figures quoted with a percent sign rather than as a plain fraction.
A little more
Then turn to social and household statistics, where coverage, participation, uptake and completion are almost always given as a share of a clearly defined population.
One step further
Finally probe narrow technical corners, where one specialised ratio, loss or content figure is second nature inside a trade and practically unknown beyond it.
Reveal answers 2,242
- Fabric contentRare60points
- Failure rateRare60points
- Fat contentRare60points
- Forest coverRare60points
- Fuel levelRare60points
- GDP growthRare60points
- Gender pay gapRare60points
- GPU usageRare60points
- Grade weightingRare60points
- Graduation rateRare60points
- Gross marginRare60points
- Growth rateRare60points
- Hand sanitizer alcohol contentRare60points
- Headshot percentageRare60points
- Health percentageRare60points
- Hearing lossRare60points
- HematocritRare60points
- Hit chanceRare60points
- Income taxRare60points
- Infection rateRare60points
- Ink levelRare60points
- Internal rate of returnRare60points
- Juice contentRare60points
- Kill percentageRare60points
- Labor force participation rateRare60points
- Lean body massRare60points
- Lean percentageRare60points
- Level progressRare60points
- Literacy rateRare60points
- Loan-to-valueRare60points
- Macronutrient ratioRare60points
- Margin of errorRare60points
- Market shareRare60points
- MarkupRare60points
- Mass percentRare60points
- Meat contentRare60points
- Medicare taxRare60points
- Memory usageRare60points
- Moisture contentRare60points
- Mortality rateRare60points
- Mortgage rateRare60points
- Muscle massRare60points
- Nicotine strengthRare60points
- Nitrogen in the airRare60points
- Obesity rateRare60points
- Occupancy rateRare60points
- Oil contentRare60points
- Oil lifeRare60points
- On-base percentageRare60points
- OpacityRare60points
Why these answers count
Points fall as more players choose the same entry, so the reveal reads as a map of consensus rather than a test of knowledge. Broad, instantly reachable measures sit at the bottom of the top band: 300 recorded answers earned 60 points, meaning plenty of people converged on the same handful of headline figures. A vast middle tier of 1836 answers earned 85, and that list shows what separates it from the floor: precision inside a field rather than celebrity. Entries such as a mutual fund distribution charge (12b-1 fee, 85), a short-term euro area lending benchmark (€STR, 85) or a post-procedure death rate (30-day mortality, 85) are professional terms rather than general knowledge, yet still familiar enough to be shared by a few players. Abandonment rate (85) lands in the same tier for the same reason. The lone 100-point entry, Albedo, was matched by nobody else, which is the lesson: the summit belongs to one narrow technical reading of the prompt that no rival tried.