Recorded answers
2,242 recorded answers
How to approach it
Sweep disciplines one at a time instead of chasing synonyms for the clue in brackets, since breadth is what pays. The productive question is which standard figure in a given trade is habitually written with a percent sign and not as a fraction, a decimal or a count. Money, clinical research, sports analytics, farming, factory quality and social surveys each hold long tails of such measures, and the tail is where the points sit. Inside a chosen field, drill from the obvious headline number down to the specialist variants that practitioners quote and outsiders never mention. Jot candidates in bulk before judging them: the middle band is crowded, and only unusual entries lift a solid list into a great one.
Get a hint
Begin with the professional vocabularies, because money, clinical research, engineering and sports analytics each keep a stock of figures quoted with a percent sign rather than as a plain fraction.
A little more
Then turn to social and household statistics, where coverage, participation, uptake and completion are almost always given as a share of a clearly defined population.
One step further
Finally probe narrow technical corners, where one specialised ratio, loss or content figure is second nature inside a trade and practically unknown beyond it.
Reveal answers 2,242
- Brand considerationDeep Cut85points
- Brand liftDeep Cut85points
- Brand preferenceDeep Cut85points
- Break point conversionDeep Cut85points
- Break points savedDeep Cut85points
- Breakdown pointDeep Cut85points
- Breakeven inflation rateDeep Cut85points
- Breast cancer riskDeep Cut85points
- Breast meat yieldDeep Cut85points
- Breastfeeding rateDeep Cut85points
- Breed percentageDeep Cut85points
- Brewhouse efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- Bribery incidenceDeep Cut85points
- Brine concentrationDeep Cut85points
- Broad money to GDPDeep Cut85points
- Broadband adoption rateDeep Cut85points
- Broken kernelsDeep Cut85points
- Broker's feeDeep Cut85points
- Bronchodilator responseDeep Cut85points
- Brush flowDeep Cut85points
- Brush hardnessDeep Cut85points
- Brush smoothingDeep Cut85points
- Brush spacingDeep Cut85points
- Budget execution rateDeep Cut85points
- Budget shareDeep Cut85points
- Bunt hit percentageDeep Cut85points
- Buyback yieldDeep Cut85points
- Buyer's premiumDeep Cut85points
- C-section rateDeep Cut85points
- Cache hit rateDeep Cut85points
- Caffeine percentageDeep Cut85points
- CAGRDeep Cut85points
- Calcium (feed label)Deep Cut85points
- Calcium carbonate equivalentDeep Cut85points
- Calf mortalityDeep Cut85points
- Call transfer rateDeep Cut85points
- Called strike plus whiff rateDeep Cut85points
- Called strike rateDeep Cut85points
- Calorie deficit percentageDeep Cut85points
- Calving percentageDeep Cut85points
- Cancellation feeDeep Cut85points
- Cancellation rateDeep Cut85points
- Canopy coverDeep Cut85points
- Cap rateDeep Cut85points
- Capacity factorDeep Cut85points
- Capacity utilizationDeep Cut85points
- Capex intensityDeep Cut85points
- Capital adequacy ratioDeep Cut85points
- Carbon capture rateDeep Cut85points
- Carbon contentDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Points fall as more players choose the same entry, so the reveal reads as a map of consensus rather than a test of knowledge. Broad, instantly reachable measures sit at the bottom of the top band: 300 recorded answers earned 60 points, meaning plenty of people converged on the same handful of headline figures. A vast middle tier of 1836 answers earned 85, and that list shows what separates it from the floor: precision inside a field rather than celebrity. Entries such as a mutual fund distribution charge (12b-1 fee, 85), a short-term euro area lending benchmark (€STR, 85) or a post-procedure death rate (30-day mortality, 85) are professional terms rather than general knowledge, yet still familiar enough to be shared by a few players. Abandonment rate (85) lands in the same tier for the same reason. The lone 100-point entry, Albedo, was matched by nobody else, which is the lesson: the summit belongs to one narrow technical reading of the prompt that no rival tried.