Krillion Recorded answers
2,242 recorded answers
How to approach it
Sweep disciplines one at a time instead of chasing synonyms for the clue in brackets, since breadth is what pays. The productive question is which standard figure in a given trade is habitually written with a percent sign and not as a fraction, a decimal or a count. Money, clinical research, sports analytics, farming, factory quality and social surveys each hold long tails of such measures, and the tail is where the points sit. Inside a chosen field, drill from the obvious headline number down to the specialist variants that practitioners quote and outsiders never mention. Jot candidates in bulk before judging them: the middle band is crowded, and only unusual entries lift a solid list into a great one.
Get a hint
Begin with the professional vocabularies, because money, clinical research, engineering and sports analytics each keep a stock of figures quoted with a percent sign rather than as a plain fraction.
A little more
Then turn to social and household statistics, where coverage, participation, uptake and completion are almost always given as a share of a clearly defined population.
One step further
Finally probe narrow technical corners, where one specialised ratio, loss or content figure is second nature inside a trade and practically unknown beyond it.
Reveal answers 2,242
- Conception rateDeep Cut85points
- Condemnation rateDeep Cut85points
- Condom use rateDeep Cut85points
- Confidence scoreDeep Cut85points
- ConfluenceDeep Cut85points
- Consignment splitDeep Cut85points
- Constant default rateDeep Cut85points
- Consumer credit growthDeep Cut85points
- Consumer spending growthDeep Cut85points
- Consumption share of GDPDeep Cut85points
- Contact rateDeep Cut85points
- ContainmentDeep Cut85points
- Containment rateDeep Cut85points
- Contested catch rateDeep Cut85points
- Contested field goal percentageDeep Cut85points
- Contested possession rateDeep Cut85points
- Context window usageDeep Cut85points
- Contingency feeDeep Cut85points
- Contraceptive failure rateDeep Cut85points
- Contraceptive prevalence rateDeep Cut85points
- Contribution marginDeep Cut85points
- Control event rateDeep Cut85points
- Control percentageDeep Cut85points
- Convenience feeDeep Cut85points
- Conviction rateDeep Cut85points
- Cooking lossDeep Cut85points
- Cooking yieldDeep Cut85points
- Coolant mixDeep Cut85points
- Cooldown reductionDeep Cut85points
- Cooperation rateDeep Cut85points
- Coral coverDeep Cut85points
- Core inflationDeep Cut85points
- Corner three percentageDeep Cut85points
- Corporate tax rateDeep Cut85points
- Corruption (strategy games)Deep Cut85points
- Corsi for percentageDeep Cut85points
- Cost of debtDeep Cut85points
- Cost of equityDeep Cut85points
- Cost shareDeep Cut85points
- Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA)Deep Cut85points
- Cost-of-living allowanceDeep Cut85points
- Countervailing dutyDeep Cut85points
- Coupon rateDeep Cut85points
- Course success rateDeep Cut85points
- Coverage rateDeep Cut85points
- Cranial vault asymmetry indexDeep Cut85points
- Crash-free rateDeep Cut85points
- Creatinine height indexDeep Cut85points
- Credible fear pass rateDeep Cut85points
- Credible intervalDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Points fall as more players choose the same entry, so the reveal reads as a map of consensus rather than a test of knowledge. Broad, instantly reachable measures sit at the bottom of the top band: 300 recorded answers earned 60 points, meaning plenty of people converged on the same handful of headline figures. A vast middle tier of 1836 answers earned 85, and that list shows what separates it from the floor: precision inside a field rather than celebrity. Entries such as a mutual fund distribution charge (12b-1 fee, 85), a short-term euro area lending benchmark (€STR, 85) or a post-procedure death rate (30-day mortality, 85) are professional terms rather than general knowledge, yet still familiar enough to be shared by a few players. Abandonment rate (85) lands in the same tier for the same reason. The lone 100-point entry, Albedo, was matched by nobody else, which is the lesson: the summit belongs to one narrow technical reading of the prompt that no rival tried.