Krillion Recorded answers
8,049 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat this as a memory-and-ranking exercise rather than a definitions test. First, list every tabletop design you can genuinely describe, from family staples and abstract classics to card-driven conflicts and economic simulations, because breadth sets your ceiling. Then sort the list by how many people worldwide could name the same title; the crowd-pleasers everyone remembers are the ones other respondents will also submit, so they pay least. Push toward items you know only from a specialist catalogue, a convention programme or a single play: regional editions, tiny print runs, series entries numbered in the dozens. Finally, test each entry against the definition, since a title without real strategic choice will not count, and copy the name exactly as the source spells it.
Get a hint
Nearly every published design qualifies, so the work is one of memory: sweep every shelf, club night and convention you have ever seen and note the titles that made you plan several moves ahead.
A little more
Move past mass-market shelves into specialist catalogues: small-press runs, imported editions, long-running series with dozens of numbered instalments and historical simulations reward the deepest memory.
One step further
The rarest picks live in the deep long tail: entries known only from hobby databases, many carrying a year and a colon in the title, odd punctuation at the front or a sparse abstract rule set.
Reveal answers 8,049
- Permainan-TabalDeep Cut85points
- Perry Rhodan: The Cosmic LeagueDeep Cut85points
- Perseverance: Castaway Chronicles – Episodes 1 & 2Deep Cut85points
- Persian IncursionDeep Cut85points
- PerspectivesDeep Cut85points
- PessoaDeep Cut85points
- PestDeep Cut85points
- PetrichorDeep Cut85points
- PetrisDeep Cut85points
- PetteiaDeep Cut85points
- PexDeep Cut85points
- PferdeäppelDeep Cut85points
- PferdemistDeep Cut85points
- PfuschDeep Cut85points
- PhalanxDeep Cut85points
- Phantom EpochDeep Cut85points
- Phantom goDeep Cut85points
- Phantom LeaderDeep Cut85points
- PharaoDeep Cut85points
- PharaonDeep Cut85points
- PhilosophyDeep Cut85points
- Philosophy shogi checkersDeep Cut85points
- PhoeniciaDeep Cut85points
- Phoenix New HorizonDeep Cut85points
- PhotosynthesisDeep Cut85points
- PhutballDeep Cut85points
- PicariaDeep Cut85points
- Pick & PackDeep Cut85points
- Pickett's ChargeDeep Cut85points
- Piepmatz: Little SongbirdsDeep Cut85points
- Piercing the ReichDeep Cut85points
- PiFroGDeep Cut85points
- PikemenDeep Cut85points
- PilareDeep Cut85points
- PilgrimDeep Cut85points
- PilusDeep Cut85points
- Pin PointDeep Cut85points
- Pink HijinksDeep Cut85points
- Pinko PallinoDeep Cut85points
- PinochleDeep Cut85points
- Pioneer DaysDeep Cut85points
- PioneersDeep Cut85points
- PipelineDeep Cut85points
- Pipeline: The Oil GameDeep Cut85points
- Pirate's CoveDeep Cut85points
- PirateerDeep Cut85points
- Pirates of MaracaiboDeep Cut85points
- Pirates of the 7 SeasDeep Cut85points
- Pirates of the Caribbean StrategoDeep Cut85points
- PitchDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Almost the entire field scored: of 7,473 recorded answers, 7,459 cleared sixty points, so the puzzle rewarded breadth of memory rather than luck. The single hundred-point entry, Rithmomachia, is a medieval arithmetic game that only a specialist would reach for, and it shows how far a genuinely obscure name can climb. The eighty-five-point band is dominated by hobby-catalogue depth: railway-economics titles such as 1830: Railways & Robber Barons, 1846: The Race for the Midwest and 18Chesapeake, alongside historical simulations like 1776 and 1812: The Invasion of Canada, all scored 85. The sixty-point tier held two hundred and twenty-four answers, recognisable designs that many respondents could name, which is precisely why they paid less. The pattern is blunt: the more players who can produce the same title, the smaller the reward, so the best move is the most specific published design you can honestly defend as a strategy game.