Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Joyce MorikuDeep Cut85points
- Joyce NdalichakoDeep Cut85points
- Joyce OsogoDeep Cut85points
- Joycelyn TettehDeep Cut85points
- Joyelle ClarkeDeep Cut85points
- Joymalya BagchiDeep Cut85points
- Joynal AbdinDeep Cut85points
- Joyo HarrietDeep Cut85points
- Jože NovakDeep Cut85points
- Jože TankoDeep Cut85points
- Jožef HorvatDeep Cut85points
- Jožef JelenDeep Cut85points
- Jožef LenartDeep Cut85points
- Jozef Ráž Jr.Deep Cut85points
- Józefa Szczurek-ŻelazkoDeep Cut85points
- Jožica DergancDeep Cut85points
- József Attila MóringDeep Cut85points
- József BenkeDeep Cut85points
- József JelencsikDeep Cut85points
- József KovácsDeep Cut85points
- József SárosiDeep Cut85points
- József-György Kulcsár-TerzaDeep Cut85points
- Ju Cheol-hyeonDeep Cut85points
- Ju Chol-gyuDeep Cut85points
- Ju Yong IlDeep Cut85points
- Jual OramDeep Cut85points
- Juan Acevedo AyalaDeep Cut85points
- Juan AfaraDeep Cut85points
- Juan Añazco VeraDeep Cut85points
- Juan Andrés González AlvearDeep Cut85points
- Juan Angel Bautista BravoDeep Cut85points
- Juan Ángel Flores BustamanteDeep Cut85points
- Juan Antonio Bibang NchuchumaDeep Cut85points
- Juan Antonio González HernándezDeep Cut85points
- Juan Antonio Martín del CampoDeep Cut85points
- Juan Antonio Meléndez OrtegaDeep Cut85points
- Juan Antonio SagredoDeep Cut85points
- Juan Antonio Valero MoralesDeep Cut85points
- Juan Armando Ruiz HernándezDeep Cut85points
- Juan Bolívar DíazDeep Cut85points
- Juan BravoDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Alemán PérezDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Alvarado PratoDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos BarujaDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Beltrán SilvaDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos BidegainDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos BlumDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Campo MorenoDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Cortés GonzálezDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos del Águila CárdenasDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.