Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Juan Carlos GalavernaDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Garcés RojasDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos García GómezDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Garcia GrandaDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Garcia MedinaDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos GiordanoDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos González BareñoDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Grimaldis PantojaDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos LoyoDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos MolinaDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Natale LópezDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos NavarroDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Ojeda ViglioneDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos OrillacDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos RequejoDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Ruiz BoixDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Sierra TrujilloDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Valdés GonzálezDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Valladares EichelmannDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Varela DomínguezDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Vargas SolerDeep Cut85points
- Juan Carlos Vega MaloDeep Cut85points
- Juan CastilloDeep Cut85points
- Juan CiscomaniDeep Cut85points
- Juan Cruz CuellarDeep Cut85points
- Juan Cruz GodoyDeep Cut85points
- Juan DarDeep Cut85points
- Juan David Londoño ArangoDeep Cut85points
- Juan David Rangel YánezDeep Cut85points
- Juan David Zuluaga ZuluagaDeep Cut85points
- Juan De La Cruz Gómez VarguillaDeep Cut85points
- Juan Duarte CuadradoDeep Cut85points
- Juan EdghillDeep Cut85points
- Juan Eduardo Romero JimenezDeep Cut85points
- Juan EscalonaDeep Cut85points
- Juan Espadas CejasDeep Cut85points
- Juan Felipe Corzo ÁlvarezDeep Cut85points
- Juan Fernández MarzoDeep Cut85points
- Juan Fernando BrüggeDeep Cut85points
- Juan Fernando Caicedo CallejasDeep Cut85points
- Juan Fernando del Granado CosioDeep Cut85points
- Juan Fernando Espinal RamírezDeep Cut85points
- Juan Francisco Elwing Aramayo BernalDeep Cut85points
- Juan Francisco Espinoza EguíaDeep Cut85points
- Juan Francisco Serrano MartínezDeep Cut85points
- Juan Gabriel RamírezDeep Cut85points
- Juan Gerardo Guerrero GarnicaDeep Cut85points
- Juan GorosterrazuDeep Cut85points
- Juan GraboisDeep Cut85points
- Juan Guillermo Rendón GómezDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.