Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Juliana Aray FrancoDeep Cut85points
- Juliana CardosoDeep Cut85points
- Juliana CorreaDeep Cut85points
- Juliana Di TullioDeep Cut85points
- Juliana GutierrezDeep Cut85points
- Juliana MuganzaDeep Cut85points
- Juliana Santillán Juárez BrahimDeep Cut85points
- Juliane Bogner-StraußDeep Cut85points
- Juliano Danga DuduDeep Cut85points
- Julie Anne GenterDeep Cut85points
- Julie CollinsDeep Cut85points
- Julie D. FisherDeep Cut85points
- Julie DabrusinDeep Cut85points
- Julie DelpechDeep Cut85points
- Julie DzerowiczDeep Cut85points
- Julie E. StuestølDeep Cut85points
- Julie ElliottDeep Cut85points
- Julie FedorchakDeep Cut85points
- Julie FrêcheDeep Cut85points
- Julie Inman GrantDeep Cut85points
- Julie JacobsenDeep Cut85points
- Julie JamesDeep Cut85points
- Julie JohnsonDeep Cut85points
- Julie LaernoesDeep Cut85points
- Julie LechanteuxDeep Cut85points
- Julie MacDougallDeep Cut85points
- Julie Mbuyi ShikuDeep Cut85points
- Julie MiddletonDeep Cut85points
- Julie MinnsDeep Cut85points
- Julie Miville-DechêneDeep Cut85points
- Julie Mukoda ZabweDeep Cut85points
- Julie OzenneDeep Cut85points
- Julie SmejkalováDeep Cut85points
- Julie SmithDeep Cut85points
- Julie StufftDeep Cut85points
- Julie TatonDeep Cut85points
- Julie ZahraDeep Cut85points
- Julie-Ann CampbellDeep Cut85points
- Julien BounieDeep Cut85points
- Julien BrugerollesDeep Cut85points
- Julien DiveDeep Cut85points
- Julien GabarronDeep Cut85points
- Julien GuibertDeep Cut85points
- Julien LimongiDeep Cut85points
- Julien MatagneDeep Cut85points
- Julien Mfwanki NyembaDeep Cut85points
- Julien OdoulDeep Cut85points
- Julien Paluku KahongyaDeep Cut85points
- Julien RancouleDeep Cut85points
- Julien RibaudoDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.