Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Julienne BarondaDeep Cut85points
- Juliet BassonDeep Cut85points
- Juliet CampbellDeep Cut85points
- Juliet Cuthbert-FlynnDeep Cut85points
- Juliet HolnessDeep Cut85points
- Juliet Kakande NakabuyeDeep Cut85points
- Juliet KhumaloDeep Cut85points
- Juliet Kyinyamatama SuubiDeep Cut85points
- Julieta Bertha Jimenez GutierrezDeep Cut85points
- Julieta Carlos Baptista VicenteDeep Cut85points
- Julieta CorrozaDeep Cut85points
- Julieta Marisol CampoDeep Cut85points
- Julieta Metral AsensioDeep Cut85points
- Julieta SierraDeep Cut85points
- Julieta Vences ValenciaDeep Cut85points
- Julieta Villalpando RiquelmeDeep Cut85points
- Jūlija SohinaDeep Cut85points
- Jūlija StepaņenkoDeep Cut85points
- Julio Alfredo PosadaDeep Cut85points
- Julio Amaury Rodríguez DepestreDeep Cut85points
- Julio ArcoverdeDeep Cut85points
- Julio Berdegué SacristánDeep Cut85points
- Júlio CesarDeep Cut85points
- Julio César Cabrera NietoDeep Cut85points
- Julio Cesar Freire De MoraisDeep Cut85points
- Julio César García RodríguezDeep Cut85points
- Julio Cesar Hernández MavoDeep Cut85points
- Julio César La Cruz PerazaDeep Cut85points
- Julio César Moreno RiveraDeep Cut85points
- Julio César Torres MolinaDeep Cut85points
- Julio César Triana QuinteroDeep Cut85points
- Julio Cesar Tuarek Carvajal GonzalesDeep Cut85points
- Julio De La GuardiaDeep Cut85points
- Julio Ernesto Gutiérrez BocanegraDeep Cut85points
- Julio Garcia ZerpaDeep Cut85points
- Julio Gómez GómezDeep Cut85points
- Julio Héctor Estrada DomínguezDeep Cut85points
- Julio Herraiz EspañaDeep Cut85points
- Julio Javier Scherer PareyónDeep Cut85points
- Julio LopesDeep Cut85points
- Julio López EscobarDeep Cut85points
- Julio Marroquín OrdóñezDeep Cut85points
- Julio MoltoDeep Cut85points
- Julio Moreno OvalleDeep Cut85points
- Julio MuratDeep Cut85points
- Julio Portillo PazDeep Cut85points
- Julio Roberto Saavedra PinettaDeep Cut85points
- Julio Roberto Salazar PerdomoDeep Cut85points
- Julio RomañaDeep Cut85points
- Julio VelardeDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.