Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Larry SöderDeep Cut85points
- Larry WhittyDeep Cut85points
- Lars AagaardDeep Cut85points
- Lars BeckmanDeep Cut85points
- Lars Boje MathiesenDeep Cut85points
- Lars CastellucciDeep Cut85points
- Lars EhmDeep Cut85points
- Lars GuggisbergDeep Cut85points
- Lars HaiseDeep Cut85points
- Lars HaltbrekkenDeep Cut85points
- Lars IsacssonDeep Cut85points
- Lars JohnssonDeep Cut85points
- Lars KlingbeilDeep Cut85points
- Lars LeijonborgDeep Cut85points
- Lars Løkke RasmussenDeep Cut85points
- Lars Marius HeggbergetDeep Cut85points
- Lars RemDeep Cut85points
- Lars RohwerDeep Cut85points
- Lars SchieskeDeep Cut85points
- Lars-Christian BraskDeep Cut85points
- Larysa BilozirDeep Cut85points
- LaSalle IshiiDeep Cut85points
- Lasha KhutsishviliDeep Cut85points
- Lasha TalakhadzeDeep Cut85points
- Lashell AdderleyDeep Cut85points
- Lasith Bhashana GamageDeep Cut85points
- Lasuba L. WangoDeep Cut85points
- László BicskeiDeep Cut85points
- László BugyaDeep Cut85points
- László CsákDeep Cut85points
- László GajdosDeep Cut85points
- László HorváthDeep Cut85points
- László LontayDeep Cut85points
- László ToroczkaiDeep Cut85points
- László Zsolt LadányiDeep Cut85points
- László-Ödön FejérDeep Cut85points
- Lata WankhedeDeep Cut85points
- Lataille N’Guessan KoffiDeep Cut85points
- Lateef FagbemiDeep Cut85points
- Lateef Kayode AreDeep Cut85points
- Lateefah SimonDeep Cut85points
- Latif SelviDeep Cut85points
- Latifa A/Temam A/GisaDeep Cut85points
- Latrae RahmingDeep Cut85points
- Lattachai ChokchaiwattanakornDeep Cut85points
- Laura Anne JonesDeep Cut85points
- Laura AsadauskaitėDeep Cut85points
- Laura BoldriniDeep Cut85points
- Laura BrometDeep Cut85points
- Laura CarneiroDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.