Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Laura CavandoliDeep Cut85points
- Laura Cristina Ahumada GarcíaDeep Cut85points
- Laura Cristina Márquez AlcaláDeep Cut85points
- Laura Daniela Beltrán PalomaresDeep Cut85points
- Laura DaviesDeep Cut85points
- Laura DiBellaDeep Cut85points
- Laura Díez BuesoDeep Cut85points
- Laura Dupuy LasserreDeep Cut85points
- Laura Elena Rodríguez MachadoDeep Cut85points
- Laura Esquivel TorresDeep Cut85points
- Laura Ester Fortich SánchezDeep Cut85points
- Laura Estrada MauroDeep Cut85points
- Laura Fernández DelgadoDeep Cut85points
- Laura FriedmanDeep Cut85points
- Laura GantenbeinDeep Cut85points
- Laura GherasimDeep Cut85points
- Laura GillenDeep Cut85points
- Laura HarmonDeep Cut85points
- Laura Hernández GarcíaDeep Cut85points
- Laura HuhtasaariDeep Cut85points
- Laura Irais Ballesteros MancillaDeep Cut85points
- Laura Isabel Fernández ReyesDeep Cut85points
- Laura Isabel Vera ZapataDeep Cut85points
- Laura Itzel CastilloDeep Cut85points
- Laura Ivonne Ruíz MorenoDeep Cut85points
- Laura Jacquemoud-RossariDeep Cut85points
- Laura Khazen LahoudDeep Cut85points
- Laura Kyrke-SmithDeep Cut85points
- Laura Marian Bacallao PadrónDeep Cut85points
- Laura Marroquín CordónDeep Cut85points
- Laura McClureDeep Cut85points
- Laura MeriluotoDeep Cut85points
- Laura MitchellDeep Cut85points
- Laura MoodieDeep Cut85points
- Laura Oroz UlibarriDeep Cut85points
- Laura RavettoDeep Cut85points
- Laura Rodríguez MatíasDeep Cut85points
- Laura SoldanoDeep Cut85points
- Laura SwettDeep Cut85points
- Laura TrottDeep Cut85points
- Laura Vanessa Díaz CuraDeep Cut85points
- Laura WyldDeep Cut85points
- Laura-Iuliana ScânteiDeep Cut85points
- Laure DarcosDeep Cut85points
- Laure LavaletteDeep Cut85points
- Laure MillerDeep Cut85points
- Laurel LeeDeep Cut85points
- Lauren EdwardsDeep Cut85points
- Lauren SullivanDeep Cut85points
- Lauren UnderwoodDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.