Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Muhammad Miqdad Ali KhanDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Moazzam Ali KhanDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Mobeen ArifDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Moin Aamer PirzadaDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Mueen WattooDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Mustafa Muhammad NajmDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad NajibDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Nawaz KhanDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Nawshad ZamirDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Nazibur RahmanDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad NumanDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Osman FarrukDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Ramez KorejDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Reza Cassam UteemDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Saad UllahDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Saadi SukriyaDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Saeed al-HasouDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Saeed SarwarDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad SaidDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad SamaanDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Shabbir Ali QureshiDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Shaharyar Khan MaharDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Shahrul Ikram YaakobDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Sharif TalibDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad SidoDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Suleiman DahlaDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Surur al-MudhibDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad SyarifuddinDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Talha MahmoodDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Tallal BadarDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad TaufikDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Tayyab AzamDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad TufailDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Usman AwaisiDeep Cut85points
- Muhammad Wissam ZaghloulDeep Cut85points
- Muhammadu Maigari DingyadiDeep Cut85points
- Muhammd bin Faysal bin Jabir Abu SaqDeep Cut85points
- Muhammed Abdullah Saeed Al-JabriDeep Cut85points
- Muhammed Dan Abba ShehuDeep Cut85points
- Muhammed Hamdullah SayeedDeep Cut85points
- Muhammed Muhammed Ahmed MansourDeep Cut85points
- Muhammet HydyrowDeep Cut85points
- Muhammetseyit SylapowDeep Cut85points
- Muhannad ShehadehDeep Cut85points
- Muharib al-HamoudDeep Cut85points
- Muharrem DemirokDeep Cut85points
- Muharrem VarlıDeep Cut85points
- Muhedi IssaDeep Cut85points
- Muhenda RonaldDeep Cut85points
- Muhia WanjikuDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.