Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Muhindo NzangiDeep Cut85points
- Muhooza DesireDeep Cut85points
- Muhoozi KainerugabaDeep Cut85points
- Muhsin al-MandalawiDeep Cut85points
- Muhwezi Jim KatuguguDeep Cut85points
- Muhyiddin YassinDeep Cut85points
- Muiruri Muthama StanleyDeep Cut85points
- Mujahid AliDeep Cut85points
- Mujeeb-ur-Rehman OmarDeep Cut85points
- Mujham Al-SuqourDeep Cut85points
- Mujibur RahmanDeep Cut85points
- Mujibur Rahman ChoudhuryDeep Cut85points
- Mujungu Jennifer KDeep Cut85points
- Mujuni Asensio MaariDeep Cut85points
- Mukaddas O'razalievaDeep Cut85points
- Mukalazi AminaDeep Cut85points
- Mukesh RajputDeep Cut85points
- Mukeshbhai J. RathwaDeep Cut85points
- Mukeshkumar Chandrakaant DalalDeep Cut85points
- Mukhaye MiriamDeep Cut85points
- Mukheimer Abu JamousDeep Cut85points
- Mukhtar Ahmad MalikDeep Cut85points
- Mukhtār ʻUmar Ṣāliḥ al-YāfiʻīDeep Cut85points
- Mukhtar RobowDeep Cut85points
- Mukiibi Eriasa SserunjogiDeep Cut85points
- Mukisa Robina HopeDeep Cut85points
- Muktar Aliyu BetaraDeep Cut85points
- Mukul WasnikDeep Cut85points
- Mulambo Hamakuni HaimbeDeep Cut85points
- Mulan JameelaDeep Cut85points
- Mulat Telayneh AsrateDeep Cut85points
- Mulela Margaret MunalulaDeep Cut85points
- Mulemya Ismail SowedDeep Cut85points
- Mulilo KabeshaDeep Cut85points
- Mulindwa David IsimbwaDeep Cut85points
- Mulipola Anarosa Ale Molio'oDeep Cut85points
- Mullah Saaduddin AkhundDeep Cut85points
- Mulondo CissyDeep Cut85points
- Mulongo SimonDeep Cut85points
- Mulu Yirga SaheleDeep Cut85points
- Muluken Admasu EmruDeep Cut85points
- Muluken Assefa JenebereDeep Cut85points
- Mulunesh Lamore UsheDeep Cut85points
- Mumba MalilaDeep Cut85points
- Mumin ChenDeep Cut85points
- Mumina Gollo BonayaDeep Cut85points
- Mumtaz Md NawiDeep Cut85points
- Mumtaz Zahra BalochDeep Cut85points
- Mun CholDeep Cut85points
- Muna Ali YassinDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.