Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Nataliya PipaDeep Cut85points
- Nataļja Marčenko-JodkoDeep Cut85points
- Natallia JakubickajaDeep Cut85points
- Natallia KachanavaDeep Cut85points
- Natallia PawlyuchenkaDeep Cut85points
- Natallia PyatkievichDeep Cut85points
- Nataly MorilloDeep Cut85points
- Nataly Vélez LoperaDeep Cut85points
- Nataly ZalkinoDeep Cut85points
- Natalya OrlovaDeep Cut85points
- Natalya ShaptalaDeep Cut85points
- Natangwe ItheteDeep Cut85points
- Nataphol TovichakchaikulDeep Cut85points
- Nataša Avšič BogovičDeep Cut85points
- Natasa Mikus ZigmanDeep Cut85points
- Nataša Pirc MusarDeep Cut85points
- Nataša SukičDeep Cut85points
- Natasha Akpoti-UduaghanDeep Cut85points
- Natasha AsgharDeep Cut85points
- Natasha DaultanaDeep Cut85points
- Natasha FranceschiDeep Cut85points
- Natasha IronsDeep Cut85points
- Natasha MazzoneDeep Cut85points
- Natasha Meli DaudeyDeep Cut85points
- Natasha Newsome DrennanDeep Cut85points
- Natasha NtlangwiniDeep Cut85points
- Natasha Singh-LewisDeep Cut85points
- Natasha SmithDeep Cut85points
- Natchanon SrikokueaDeep Cut85points
- Natchat WongprasertDeep Cut85points
- Natchira ImwisetDeep Cut85points
- Natela TurnavaDeep Cut85points
- Nathachanon ChanaburanasakDeep Cut85points
- Nathalie Castillo RojasDeep Cut85points
- Nathalie CoggiaDeep Cut85points
- Nathalie Colin-OesterléDeep Cut85points
- Nathalie Da Conceicao CarvalhoDeep Cut85points
- Nathalie DelattreDeep Cut85points
- Nathalie GouletDeep Cut85points
- Nathalie MorgenthalerDeep Cut85points
- Nathalie MuylleDeep Cut85points
- Nathalie NiesonDeep Cut85points
- Nathalie OziolDeep Cut85points
- Nathalie ProvostDeep Cut85points
- Nathaly Abril Chuquimia RivasDeep Cut85points
- Nathaly Estefania Farinango DelgadoDeep Cut85points
- Nathaly MolinaDeep Cut85points
- Nathaly Tovias ClaureDeep Cut85points
- Nathanael LiminskiDeep Cut85points
- Nathaniel Erskine-SmithDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.