Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Nathaniel MoranDeep Cut85points
- Nathwani ParimalDeep Cut85points
- Natilien JosephDeep Cut85points
- Natire Ann GraceDeep Cut85points
- Natjaree AnuntasilpaDeep Cut85points
- Natsagdorjiin BatsümberelDeep Cut85points
- Natsuko MaruoDeep Cut85points
- Nattacha BoonchaiinsawatDeep Cut85points
- Nattakit NurodDeep Cut85points
- Nattaphon KlumrianthongDeep Cut85points
- Nattaphong SumanothamDeep Cut85points
- Nattaya BoonpakdeeDeep Cut85points
- Natthaphon CharatrapeepongDeep Cut85points
- Natthaphon NarkphanitDeep Cut85points
- Natthaphong RuengpanyawutDeep Cut85points
- Natthapol RangsitpolDeep Cut85points
- Natthathon PhrosunthonDeep Cut85points
- Natthawat PhimphanitDeep Cut85points
- Natthawut BuaprathumDeep Cut85points
- Natthida LekudakornDeep Cut85points
- Natthida ThepsuthinDeep Cut85points
- Natthineephon ChantharanothaiDeep Cut85points
- Natthriya ThaweewongDeep Cut85points
- Natumanya FloraDeep Cut85points
- Naturinda EliabDeep Cut85points
- Naty Poob Pijy Jiménez VásquezDeep Cut85points
- Nauman Islam ShaikhDeep Cut85points
- Nauris PuntulisDeep Cut85points
- Naushabah KhanDeep Cut85points
- Navaskani KDeep Cut85points
- Naveed AamirDeep Cut85points
- Naveed AshrafDeep Cut85points
- Naveen JainDeep Cut85points
- Naveen JindalDeep Cut85points
- Navendu MishraDeep Cut85points
- Navin RamgoolamDeep Cut85points
- Navnit DholakiaDeep Cut85points
- Nawabzada Iftikhar Ahmed Khan BabarDeep Cut85points
- Nawabzada Mir Jamal Khan RaisaniDeep Cut85points
- Nawaf Al-MawadahDeep Cut85points
- Nawaf SalamDeep Cut85points
- Nawal FarihDeep Cut85points
- Nawar NajmaDeep Cut85points
- Nawe Molly KamukamaDeep Cut85points
- Nawinda SawatdetdeeDeep Cut85points
- Nawume Hisiaha ThomasDeep Cut85points
- Nayab Yusuf AhmedDeep Cut85points
- Nayana WasalathilakaDeep Cut85points
- Nayef Al QadiDeep Cut85points
- Nayef al-BakriDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.