Krillion Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Sara ContiDeep Cut85points
- Sara CrowleyDeep Cut85points
- Sara El NahasDeep Cut85points
- Sara EstradaDeep Cut85points
- Sara FalahiDeep Cut85points
- Sara FerrariDeep Cut85points
- Sara FialhoDeep Cut85points
- Sara FladjeDeep Cut85points
- Sara GilleDeep Cut85points
- Sara HydeDeep Cut85points
- Sara Irene Herrerías GuerraDeep Cut85points
- Sara JacobsDeep Cut85points
- Sara Jaime OntiverosDeep Cut85points
- Sara KelanyDeep Cut85points
- Sara Mohammad FalaknazDeep Cut85points
- Sara MusallamDeep Cut85points
- Sara NanniDeep Cut85points
- Sara Noemí Cabrera ChacónDeep Cut85points
- Sara PavkovDeep Cut85points
- Sara SeppänenDeep Cut85points
- Sarabjeet Singh KhalsaDeep Cut85points
- Sarah AkolDeep Cut85points
- Sarah Al AmiriDeep Cut85points
- Sarah Benjamin GabrielDeep Cut85points
- Sarah BoolDeep Cut85points
- Sarah BreedenDeep Cut85points
- Sarah BrownDeep Cut85points
- Sarah Brown-ShadeckDeep Cut85points
- Sarah BrowneDeep Cut85points
- Sarah ChampionDeep Cut85points
- Sarah Charity Kimbo YacubDeep Cut85points
- Sarah ClarkDeep Cut85points
- Sarah CookeDeep Cut85points
- Sarah CoombesDeep Cut85points
- Sarah Cooper-LesaddDeep Cut85points
- Sarah DobbeDeep Cut85points
- Sarah DykeDeep Cut85points
- Sarah EdwardsDeep Cut85points
- Sarah El BoujdainiDeep Cut85points
- Sarah El HaïryDeep Cut85points
- Sarah ElagoDeep Cut85points
- Sarah ElfrethDeep Cut85points
- Sarah GibsonDeep Cut85points
- Sarah GreenDeep Cut85points
- Sarah HallDeep Cut85points
- Sarah Hanson-YoungDeep Cut85points
- Sarah HendersonDeep Cut85points
- Sarah HoggDeep Cut85points
- Sarah JonesDeep Cut85points
- Sarah Kayaki NetalisileDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.