Recorded answers
36,048 recorded answers
How to approach it
The trick is to treat the prompt as a wide funnel rather than a popularity contest. Begin with the people you know best, then deliberately travel to countries whose politics rarely make headlines and reconstruct a name from a roster you remember. National legislatures publish member lists, so recall a chamber you have read about — a small assembly, a federal upper house, a coalition partner's bench — and pick a single sitting member. Verify mentally that the person holds office now, not a decade ago. Then consider the scoring logic: the puzzle rewards answers that many people can confirm but few will think of, so an accurate, verifiable name from an overlooked country beats a famous one almost every time.
Get a hint
Start at the very top of the executive ladder: heads of government, their deputies and the senior ministers who were in office this week.
A little more
Narrow by chamber instead: a single seat in a national legislature is enough, so think of backbenchers, whips and committee chairs as well as speakers.
One step further
Go for depth over fame: a member of a small national assembly or a junior minister in a country that rarely makes the news usually scores higher than a household-name premier.
Reveal answers 36,048
- Sarah LegrainDeep Cut85points
- Sarah LudfordDeep Cut85points
- Sarah MacintoshDeep Cut85points
- Sarah María Varona PazosDeep Cut85points
- Sarah MullallyDeep Cut85points
- Sarah MurphyDeep Cut85points
- Sarah NabiryeDeep Cut85points
- Sarah NakawundeDeep Cut85points
- Sarah NanyongaDeep Cut85points
- Sarah Nyakuoth KuachDeep Cut85points
- Sarah Nyaliep Jok GaiDeep Cut85points
- Sarah O'ReillyDeep Cut85points
- Sarah OlneyDeep Cut85points
- Sarah Opendi AchiengDeep Cut85points
- Sarah OwenDeep Cut85points
- Sarah Paulata KorereDeep Cut85points
- Sarah PochinDeep Cut85points
- Sarah ReesDeep Cut85points
- Sarah RussellDeep Cut85points
- Sarah SackmanDeep Cut85points
- Sarah SchlitzDeep Cut85points
- Sarah SmithDeep Cut85points
- Sarah TeatherDeep Cut85points
- Sarah TumwineDeep Cut85points
- Sarah VollathDeep Cut85points
- Sarah WittyDeep Cut85points
- Sarah WyssDeep Cut85points
- Saraí EspinalDeep Cut85points
- Saran TimsuwanDeep Cut85points
- Sarana BoonbaichaiyapruckDeep Cut85points
- Saranda BogujevciDeep Cut85points
- Saraou BernadetteDeep Cut85points
- Sarasa Venkatanarayana BhattiDeep Cut85points
- Saraswoti LamaDeep Cut85points
- Sarath HamstraDeep Cut85points
- Sarath KumaraDeep Cut85points
- Saravanan MuruganDeep Cut85points
- Sarawut SongsivilaiDeep Cut85points
- Saray Vázquez AdasaDeep Cut85points
- Sarayut SanguanphokhaiDeep Cut85points
- Sarayut YimyuanDeep Cut85points
- Sarbananda SonowalDeep Cut85points
- Sardana AvksentievaDeep Cut85points
- Sardar Al Haj Muhammad Umer GorgaijDeep Cut85points
- Sardar Ghulam AbbasDeep Cut85points
- Sardar Md. Sakhawat HusainDeep Cut85points
- Sardar Muhammad Latif Khan KhosaDeep Cut85points
- Sardar Muhammad Yaqoob Khan NasarDeep Cut85points
- Sardar Muhammad Yousaf ZamanDeep Cut85points
- Sardar Nabil Ahmed GabolDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Scoring here is driven by rarity rather than prominence. The single hundred-point answer, Michael Dobbs, sits alone at the top precisely because almost nobody else named that individual, while the enormous 85-point band contains tens of thousands of sitting members drawn from national chambers across every continent, from A B M Mosharrof Hossain and A. A. Rahim to Aaron Bean and Abdoulaye Diop. Those answers were correct, current and specific enough to satisfy the checker, yet common enough among players that they landed in the second tier. Below them, the 60-point group of 328 answers was presumably made up of figures who were either extremely well known, slightly stale in office, or generically described in a way that reduced their value. The lesson is blunt: a verifiable backbencher from a legislature nobody discusses is worth more than a prime minister everyone recognises, and a precise full name outperforms a vague one.