Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- NGC 2297Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2298Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2299Deep Cut85points
- NGC 23Deep Cut85points
- NGC 230Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2300Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2302Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2303Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2304Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2305Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2307Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2308Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2309Deep Cut85points
- NGC 231Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2310Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2311Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2314Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2315Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2316Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2317Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2318Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2319Deep Cut85points
- NGC 232Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2320Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2321Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2322Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2324Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2325Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2326Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2326ADeep Cut85points
- NGC 2327Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2328Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2329Deep Cut85points
- NGC 233Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2330Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2331Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2332Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2333Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2334Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2335Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2336Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2337Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2339Deep Cut85points
- NGC 234Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2340Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2341Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2342Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2343Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2344Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2345Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.