Krillion Recorded answers
30,029 recorded answers
How to approach it
Work from the smallest scale outward rather than trying to recall a single famous object. List the categories that can satisfy the size test — planets, natural satellites, stars, nebulae, clusters, galaxies — and then ask which members of each you can actually name with confidence. Anything with a catalogue number or a Bayer-style letter counts, so you are not restricted to household names; star catalogues alone supply thousands of valid answers. Weigh your options by how distinctive they are, not by how impressive they sound: a well-known giant is safe but widely shared, while an obscure survey object is harder to verify but far less crowded. Before committing, sanity-check the diameter against the lunar baseline so you do not lose the point on a technicality.
Get a hint
Begin at the scale you can picture without effort and then widen the frame, because the answer does not have to be something famous, only something real and large enough to be measured.
A little more
Then think in terms of catalogues, since most qualifying objects are not famous at all: they carry numbers, Greek letters or survey codes instead of memorable names.
One step further
Finally stretch the scale to its extremes, because the biggest candidates can be whole galaxies or gas clouds spanning many times the width of any planet, and those uncommon answers tend to be worth more.
Reveal answers 30,029
- NGC 2347Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2348Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2349Deep Cut85points
- NGC 235Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2350Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2353Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2354Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2355Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2357Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2358Deep Cut85points
- NGC 235ADeep Cut85points
- NGC 235BDeep Cut85points
- NGC 236Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2361Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2363Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2363-V1Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2364Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2365Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2366Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2367Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2368Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2369Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2369ADeep Cut85points
- NGC 2369BDeep Cut85points
- NGC 237Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2370Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2371-2Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2373Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2374Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2375Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2376Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2377Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2379Deep Cut85points
- NGC 238Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2380Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2381Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2383Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2384Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2385Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2387Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2388Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2389Deep Cut85points
- NGC 239Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2393Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2395Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2396Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2397Deep Cut85points
- NGC 2397ADeep Cut85points
- NGC 2397BDeep Cut85points
- NGC 2398Deep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The reveal held 30,029 recorded answers, and the distribution is unusually lopsided: a single entry at 100 points, 29,941 sitting at 85, and 72 scraping 60. That shape tells you most solvers converged on the same safe territory. The 85-point band is dominated by numbered stellar designations such as 1 Aquarii or 10 Andromedae — individually correct, trivially generated, and therefore shared by thousands of players, which caps their value. Bare catalogue codes behave the same way: 0313-192 and 037-B327 are perfectly valid picks, yet they still landed at 85, because hundreds of players reached for the same lists. The lone 100-point answer, Hanny's Voorwerp, is a different animal — a genuinely distinctive, almost quirky object that few would name unprompted, and the scoring rewarded that originality. Answers that fell to 60 were presumably vaguer or even more heavily repeated. The lesson: correctness gets you into the 85-point band, but only a memorable, unexpected object breaks past it.