Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- BagpipingOne in a Krillion100points
- 2D designDeep Cut85points
- 3D modelingDeep Cut85points
- 4D designDeep Cut85points
- AbkhazDeep Cut85points
- Aboriginal studiesDeep Cut85points
- Academic advisingDeep Cut85points
- Accelerator physicsDeep Cut85points
- Accessories designDeep Cut85points
- AccordionDeep Cut85points
- Accountancy and data analyticsDeep Cut85points
- Accountancy and data scienceDeep Cut85points
- Accounting analyticsDeep Cut85points
- Accounting and computer scienceDeep Cut85points
- Accounting and financial managementDeep Cut85points
- Accounting and managementDeep Cut85points
- Accounting information systemsDeep Cut85points
- Acoustical engineeringDeep Cut85points
- AcousticsDeep Cut85points
- Acoustics and music technologyDeep Cut85points
- Actuarial and quantitative risk managementDeep Cut85points
- Acute care nurse practitionerDeep Cut85points
- Adapted physical educationDeep Cut85points
- Addiction medicineDeep Cut85points
- Addiction psychiatryDeep Cut85points
- Addiction psychologyDeep Cut85points
- Additive manufacturingDeep Cut85points
- Additive manufacturing and designDeep Cut85points
- Administration, economics and social studiesDeep Cut85points
- Administrative lawDeep Cut85points
- Adult and community college educationDeep Cut85points
- Adult educationDeep Cut85points
- Adult learning and global changeDeep Cut85points
- Adult nursingDeep Cut85points
- Adult-gerontology nurse practitionerDeep Cut85points
- Adult-gerontology primary care nurse practitionerDeep Cut85points
- Advaita VedantaDeep Cut85points
- Advanced architectural designDeep Cut85points
- Advanced clinical practiceDeep Cut85points
- Advanced dental studiesDeep Cut85points
- Advanced general dentistryDeep Cut85points
- Advanced Materials ManufacturingDeep Cut85points
- Advanced military studiesDeep Cut85points
- Advanced practice nursingDeep Cut85points
- Advanced urban designDeep Cut85points
- Adventure sports coachingDeep Cut85points
- Adventure tourismDeep Cut85points
- Advertising and digital designDeep Cut85points
- Advertising and public relationsDeep Cut85points
- AerodynamicsDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.