Krillion Recorded answers
2,242 recorded answers
How to approach it
Sweep disciplines one at a time instead of chasing synonyms for the clue in brackets, since breadth is what pays. The productive question is which standard figure in a given trade is habitually written with a percent sign and not as a fraction, a decimal or a count. Money, clinical research, sports analytics, farming, factory quality and social surveys each hold long tails of such measures, and the tail is where the points sit. Inside a chosen field, drill from the obvious headline number down to the specialist variants that practitioners quote and outsiders never mention. Jot candidates in bulk before judging them: the middle band is crowded, and only unusual entries lift a solid list into a great one.
Get a hint
Begin with the professional vocabularies, because money, clinical research, engineering and sports analytics each keep a stock of figures quoted with a percent sign rather than as a plain fraction.
A little more
Then turn to social and household statistics, where coverage, participation, uptake and completion are almost always given as a share of a clearly defined population.
One step further
Finally probe narrow technical corners, where one specialised ratio, loss or content figure is second nature inside a trade and practically unknown beyond it.
Reveal answers 2,242
- Pole percentageDeep Cut85points
- Policy loan interest rateDeep Cut85points
- Pollination rateDeep Cut85points
- Polling errorDeep Cut85points
- Polyunsaturated fat percentageDeep Cut85points
- Poor or fair healthDeep Cut85points
- Population attributable fractionDeep Cut85points
- PorosityDeep Cut85points
- Portfolio turnoverDeep Cut85points
- Portfolio weightDeep Cut85points
- Positive biopsy cores percentageDeep Cut85points
- Positive predictive valueDeep Cut85points
- Post hardship differentialDeep Cut85points
- Post-judgment interestDeep Cut85points
- Posterior probabilityDeep Cut85points
- Postharvest lossDeep Cut85points
- PostTrak scoreDeep Cut85points
- Pot successDeep Cut85points
- Potash contentDeep Cut85points
- Potential alcoholDeep Cut85points
- Pour costDeep Cut85points
- Poverty gapDeep Cut85points
- Power (Five Nights at Freddy's)Deep Cut85points
- Power (statistics)Deep Cut85points
- Power factorDeep Cut85points
- Power levelDeep Cut85points
- Power limitDeep Cut85points
- Power play percentageDeep Cut85points
- Power supply efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- Pre-test probabilityDeep Cut85points
- Prediction interval levelDeep Cut85points
- Preferred returnDeep Cut85points
- Preflop raise percentage (PFR)Deep Cut85points
- Pregnancy rateDeep Cut85points
- Prejudgment interestDeep Cut85points
- Premature NCD mortalityDeep Cut85points
- Premium (bond)Deep Cut85points
- Premium affordability thresholdDeep Cut85points
- Premium taxDeep Cut85points
- Prenatal care coverageDeep Cut85points
- Prepayment penaltyDeep Cut85points
- Prepayment rateDeep Cut85points
- Presence (pick-ban)Deep Cut85points
- Pressure rateDeep Cut85points
- Pressure success rateDeep Cut85points
- Pressure ulcer prevalenceDeep Cut85points
- Pretax profit marginDeep Cut85points
- Preterm birth rateDeep Cut85points
- Pretrial detention rateDeep Cut85points
- PrevalenceDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Points fall as more players choose the same entry, so the reveal reads as a map of consensus rather than a test of knowledge. Broad, instantly reachable measures sit at the bottom of the top band: 300 recorded answers earned 60 points, meaning plenty of people converged on the same handful of headline figures. A vast middle tier of 1836 answers earned 85, and that list shows what separates it from the floor: precision inside a field rather than celebrity. Entries such as a mutual fund distribution charge (12b-1 fee, 85), a short-term euro area lending benchmark (€STR, 85) or a post-procedure death rate (30-day mortality, 85) are professional terms rather than general knowledge, yet still familiar enough to be shared by a few players. Abandonment rate (85) lands in the same tier for the same reason. The lone 100-point entry, Albedo, was matched by nobody else, which is the lesson: the summit belongs to one narrow technical reading of the prompt that no rival tried.