Krillion Recorded answers
2,242 recorded answers
How to approach it
Sweep disciplines one at a time instead of chasing synonyms for the clue in brackets, since breadth is what pays. The productive question is which standard figure in a given trade is habitually written with a percent sign and not as a fraction, a decimal or a count. Money, clinical research, sports analytics, farming, factory quality and social surveys each hold long tails of such measures, and the tail is where the points sit. Inside a chosen field, drill from the obvious headline number down to the specialist variants that practitioners quote and outsiders never mention. Jot candidates in bulk before judging them: the middle band is crowded, and only unusual entries lift a solid list into a great one.
Get a hint
Begin with the professional vocabularies, because money, clinical research, engineering and sports analytics each keep a stock of figures quoted with a percent sign rather than as a plain fraction.
A little more
Then turn to social and household statistics, where coverage, participation, uptake and completion are almost always given as a share of a clearly defined population.
One step further
Finally probe narrow technical corners, where one specialised ratio, loss or content figure is second nature inside a trade and practically unknown beyond it.
Reveal answers 2,242
- Prevalence of undernourishmentDeep Cut85points
- Prevalence thresholdDeep Cut85points
- Preventable fractionDeep Cut85points
- Price target upsideDeep Cut85points
- Prime costDeep Cut85points
- Prior probabilityDeep Cut85points
- Prison occupancy rateDeep Cut85points
- Probability of defaultDeep Cut85points
- Probability of paternityDeep Cut85points
- Probability of profitDeep Cut85points
- Probate feeDeep Cut85points
- Probation revocation rateDeep Cut85points
- Proc chanceDeep Cut85points
- Processing feeDeep Cut85points
- Producer price inflationDeep Cut85points
- Productivity growthDeep Cut85points
- Proficiency rateDeep Cut85points
- Profile completenessDeep Cut85points
- Profit participationDeep Cut85points
- Profit shareDeep Cut85points
- Progression-free survivalDeep Cut85points
- Promotion rateDeep Cut85points
- Proportionate mortalityDeep Cut85points
- Propulsive efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- Protected area coverageDeep Cut85points
- Protein bindingDeep Cut85points
- Protein C activityDeep Cut85points
- Protein S activityDeep Cut85points
- Prothrombin activityDeep Cut85points
- Province controlDeep Cut85points
- Provincial sales taxDeep Cut85points
- Psoriasis body surface areaDeep Cut85points
- Psoriasis improvement (PASI 75)Deep Cut85points
- Public betting percentageDeep Cut85points
- Public sector employment shareDeep Cut85points
- Pull percentageDeep Cut85points
- Pull-up percentageDeep Cut85points
- Pump efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- Punch connect percentageDeep Cut85points
- Punts inside the 20 (%)Deep Cut85points
- Purchase intentDeep Cut85points
- Pure live seedDeep Cut85points
- Push percentageDeep Cut85points
- Putaway percentageDeep Cut85points
- Putting percentageDeep Cut85points
- Pythagorean winning percentageDeep Cut85points
- Q30 scoreDeep Cut85points
- QB knockdown rateDeep Cut85points
- Quality scoreDeep Cut85points
- Quality start percentageDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Points fall as more players choose the same entry, so the reveal reads as a map of consensus rather than a test of knowledge. Broad, instantly reachable measures sit at the bottom of the top band: 300 recorded answers earned 60 points, meaning plenty of people converged on the same handful of headline figures. A vast middle tier of 1836 answers earned 85, and that list shows what separates it from the floor: precision inside a field rather than celebrity. Entries such as a mutual fund distribution charge (12b-1 fee, 85), a short-term euro area lending benchmark (€STR, 85) or a post-procedure death rate (30-day mortality, 85) are professional terms rather than general knowledge, yet still familiar enough to be shared by a few players. Abandonment rate (85) lands in the same tier for the same reason. The lone 100-point entry, Albedo, was matched by nobody else, which is the lesson: the summit belongs to one narrow technical reading of the prompt that no rival tried.