Name something traditionally expressed as a percentage (like body fat)

October 26, 2026 · Daily Dive #103

Explore 2,242 recorded answers and their points for question 3 on October 26, 2026.

Dated record7 questions · 12,583 recorded answers

2,242 recorded names on October 26, 2026, 2,037 at 85 or higher. The highest recorded score on this question is 100.

Hunt across trades and disciplines for measurements built as a part of a whole, such as risk estimates, survey findings, uptake levels or attainment. Any named quantity whose conventional notation is the percent sign qualifies, from technical ratios to everyday statistics; absolute counts, proportions written as fractions and measures in other units do not.

2,242 recorded answers2,037 at 85+ points100 highest recorded points
  • One in a Krillion1100 pts
  • Deep Cut2,03685 pts
  • Rare18160 pts
  • Schooler1630 pts
  • Plankton810 pts
03

Recorded answers

2,242 recorded answers

How to approach it

Sweep disciplines one at a time instead of chasing synonyms for the clue in brackets, since breadth is what pays. The productive question is which standard figure in a given trade is habitually written with a percent sign and not as a fraction, a decimal or a count. Money, clinical research, sports analytics, farming, factory quality and social surveys each hold long tails of such measures, and the tail is where the points sit. Inside a chosen field, drill from the obvious headline number down to the specialist variants that practitioners quote and outsiders never mention. Jot candidates in bulk before judging them: the middle band is crowded, and only unusual entries lift a solid list into a great one.

Get a hint

Begin with the professional vocabularies, because money, clinical research, engineering and sports analytics each keep a stock of figures quoted with a percent sign rather than as a plain fraction.

A little more

Then turn to social and household statistics, where coverage, participation, uptake and completion are almost always given as a share of a clearly defined population.

One step further

Finally probe narrow technical corners, where one specialised ratio, loss or content figure is second nature inside a trade and practically unknown beyond it.

Reveal answers 2,242
  • Quantize strengthDeep Cut85points
  • Quantum efficiencyDeep Cut85points
  • Quantum yieldDeep Cut85points
  • Quarter-over-quarter growthDeep Cut85points
  • Query coverageDeep Cut85points
  • Quits rateDeep Cut85points
  • Quota attainmentDeep Cut85points
  • Quota shareDeep Cut85points
  • R-squaredDeep Cut85points
  • R&D intensityDeep Cut85points
  • Radioactive iodine uptakeDeep Cut85points
  • RakeDeep Cut85points
  • RakebackDeep Cut85points
  • Rally win percentageDeep Cut85points
  • Rate capsDeep Cut85points
  • Rate of change indicatorDeep Cut85points
  • ReachDeep Cut85points
  • Reactant conversionDeep Cut85points
  • Reactor power levelDeep Cut85points
  • Readmission rateDeep Cut85points
  • Real interest rateDeep Cut85points
  • Real rate of returnDeep Cut85points
  • Real yieldDeep Cut85points
  • Realized yieldDeep Cut85points
  • Rebound chance percentageDeep Cut85points
  • Rebound percentageDeep Cut85points
  • Rebound resilienceDeep Cut85points
  • Receptor occupancyDeep Cut85points
  • Recession probabilityDeep Cut85points
  • Recidivism rateDeep Cut85points
  • Recombination frequencyDeep Cut85points
  • Recommendation rateDeep Cut85points
  • Recovery factorDeep Cut85points
  • Recovery rateDeep Cut85points
  • Recovery scoreDeep Cut85points
  • Recurrence rateDeep Cut85points
  • Recycled contentDeep Cut85points
  • Recycling contamination rateDeep Cut85points
  • Recycling rateDeep Cut85points
  • Red cell distribution widthDeep Cut85points
  • Red zone percentageDeep Cut85points
  • Redemption feeDeep Cut85points
  • Reduce White PointDeep Cut85points
  • Reduction of areaDeep Cut85points
  • Reelection rateDeep Cut85points
  • Referral feeDeep Cut85points
  • ReflectanceDeep Cut85points
  • Refrigerant leak rateDeep Cut85points
  • Refusal rateDeep Cut85points
  • Regrettable attritionDeep Cut85points

Why these answers count

Points fall as more players choose the same entry, so the reveal reads as a map of consensus rather than a test of knowledge. Broad, instantly reachable measures sit at the bottom of the top band: 300 recorded answers earned 60 points, meaning plenty of people converged on the same handful of headline figures. A vast middle tier of 1836 answers earned 85, and that list shows what separates it from the floor: precision inside a field rather than celebrity. Entries such as a mutual fund distribution charge (12b-1 fee, 85), a short-term euro area lending benchmark (€STR, 85) or a post-procedure death rate (30-day mortality, 85) are professional terms rather than general knowledge, yet still familiar enough to be shared by a few players. Abandonment rate (85) lands in the same tier for the same reason. The lone 100-point entry, Albedo, was matched by nobody else, which is the lesson: the summit belongs to one narrow technical reading of the prompt that no rival tried.

Recorded from the game’s published reveal · Source · Checked 26 Oct, 08:25 UTC

Names and scores reflect the linked dated reveal. The original game makes the final decision on live acceptance. Editorial policy