Name something traditionally expressed as a percentage (like body fat)

October 26, 2026 · Daily Dive #103

Explore 2,242 recorded answers and their points for question 3 on October 26, 2026.

Dated record7 questions · 12,583 recorded answers

2,242 recorded names on October 26, 2026, 2,037 at 85 or higher. The highest recorded score on this question is 100.

Hunt across trades and disciplines for measurements built as a part of a whole, such as risk estimates, survey findings, uptake levels or attainment. Any named quantity whose conventional notation is the percent sign qualifies, from technical ratios to everyday statistics; absolute counts, proportions written as fractions and measures in other units do not.

2,242 recorded answers2,037 at 85+ points100 highest recorded points
  • One in a Krillion1100 pts
  • Deep Cut2,03685 pts
  • Rare18160 pts
  • Schooler1630 pts
  • Plankton810 pts
03

Recorded answers

2,242 recorded answers

How to approach it

Sweep disciplines one at a time instead of chasing synonyms for the clue in brackets, since breadth is what pays. The productive question is which standard figure in a given trade is habitually written with a percent sign and not as a fraction, a decimal or a count. Money, clinical research, sports analytics, farming, factory quality and social surveys each hold long tails of such measures, and the tail is where the points sit. Inside a chosen field, drill from the obvious headline number down to the specialist variants that practitioners quote and outsiders never mention. Jot candidates in bulk before judging them: the middle band is crowded, and only unusual entries lift a solid list into a great one.

Get a hint

Begin with the professional vocabularies, because money, clinical research, engineering and sports analytics each keep a stock of figures quoted with a percent sign rather than as a plain fraction.

A little more

Then turn to social and household statistics, where coverage, participation, uptake and completion are almost always given as a share of a clearly defined population.

One step further

Finally probe narrow technical corners, where one specialised ratio, loss or content figure is second nature inside a trade and practically unknown beyond it.

Reveal answers 2,242
  • Veteran shareDeep Cut85points
  • Video completion rateDeep Cut85points
  • View rateDeep Cut85points
  • ViewabilityDeep Cut85points
  • VigDeep Cut85points
  • Visa approval rateDeep Cut85points
  • Visa overstay rateDeep Cut85points
  • Visa refusal rateDeep Cut85points
  • Vision shareDeep Cut85points
  • Visual field indexDeep Cut85points
  • Visual impairment ratingDeep Cut85points
  • Vitiligo extentDeep Cut85points
  • VOC contentDeep Cut85points
  • Volatile matterDeep Cut85points
  • VolatilityDeep Cut85points
  • Voltage dropDeep Cut85points
  • Voltage regulationDeep Cut85points
  • Volume percentDeep Cut85points
  • Volumetric efficiencyDeep Cut85points
  • Von Willebrand factor activityDeep Cut85points
  • Voter registration rateDeep Cut85points
  • Voting powerDeep Cut85points
  • VPIPDeep Cut85points
  • Vulnerable employmentDeep Cut85points
  • Wage and salaried workers shareDeep Cut85points
  • Wage garnishmentDeep Cut85points
  • Walk rateDeep Cut85points
  • Walking asymmetryDeep Cut85points
  • Wall-plug efficiencyDeep Cut85points
  • War scoreDeep Cut85points
  • War supportDeep Cut85points
  • Waste factorDeep Cut85points
  • Wasted vote shareDeep Cut85points
  • Wasting rateDeep Cut85points
  • Water absorptionDeep Cut85points
  • Water access rateDeep Cut85points
  • Water cutDeep Cut85points
  • Water saturationDeep Cut85points
  • Water stressDeep Cut85points
  • Water vaporDeep Cut85points
  • Wealth share of the top 1%Deep Cut85points
  • Wealth taxDeep Cut85points
  • Weaning percentageDeep Cut85points
  • Wear leveling countDeep Cut85points
  • Weed controlDeep Cut85points
  • Weed coverDeep Cut85points
  • Weed seed percentageDeep Cut85points
  • Weight distributionDeep Cut85points
  • Weight-bearing percentageDeep Cut85points
  • Weight/volume percentDeep Cut85points

Why these answers count

Points fall as more players choose the same entry, so the reveal reads as a map of consensus rather than a test of knowledge. Broad, instantly reachable measures sit at the bottom of the top band: 300 recorded answers earned 60 points, meaning plenty of people converged on the same handful of headline figures. A vast middle tier of 1836 answers earned 85, and that list shows what separates it from the floor: precision inside a field rather than celebrity. Entries such as a mutual fund distribution charge (12b-1 fee, 85), a short-term euro area lending benchmark (€STR, 85) or a post-procedure death rate (30-day mortality, 85) are professional terms rather than general knowledge, yet still familiar enough to be shared by a few players. Abandonment rate (85) lands in the same tier for the same reason. The lone 100-point entry, Albedo, was matched by nobody else, which is the lesson: the summit belongs to one narrow technical reading of the prompt that no rival tried.

Recorded from the game’s published reveal · Source · Checked 26 Oct, 08:25 UTC

Names and scores reflect the linked dated reveal. The original game makes the final decision on live acceptance. Editorial policy