Recorded answers
2,242 recorded answers
How to approach it
Sweep disciplines one at a time instead of chasing synonyms for the clue in brackets, since breadth is what pays. The productive question is which standard figure in a given trade is habitually written with a percent sign and not as a fraction, a decimal or a count. Money, clinical research, sports analytics, farming, factory quality and social surveys each hold long tails of such measures, and the tail is where the points sit. Inside a chosen field, drill from the obvious headline number down to the specialist variants that practitioners quote and outsiders never mention. Jot candidates in bulk before judging them: the middle band is crowded, and only unusual entries lift a solid list into a great one.
Get a hint
Begin with the professional vocabularies, because money, clinical research, engineering and sports analytics each keep a stock of figures quoted with a percent sign rather than as a plain fraction.
A little more
Then turn to social and household statistics, where coverage, participation, uptake and completion are almost always given as a share of a clearly defined population.
One step further
Finally probe narrow technical corners, where one specialised ratio, loss or content figure is second nature inside a trade and practically unknown beyond it.
Reveal answers 2,242
- Veteran shareDeep Cut85points
- Video completion rateDeep Cut85points
- View rateDeep Cut85points
- ViewabilityDeep Cut85points
- VigDeep Cut85points
- Visa approval rateDeep Cut85points
- Visa overstay rateDeep Cut85points
- Visa refusal rateDeep Cut85points
- Vision shareDeep Cut85points
- Visual field indexDeep Cut85points
- Visual impairment ratingDeep Cut85points
- Vitiligo extentDeep Cut85points
- VOC contentDeep Cut85points
- Volatile matterDeep Cut85points
- VolatilityDeep Cut85points
- Voltage dropDeep Cut85points
- Voltage regulationDeep Cut85points
- Volume percentDeep Cut85points
- Volumetric efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- Von Willebrand factor activityDeep Cut85points
- Voter registration rateDeep Cut85points
- Voting powerDeep Cut85points
- VPIPDeep Cut85points
- Vulnerable employmentDeep Cut85points
- Wage and salaried workers shareDeep Cut85points
- Wage garnishmentDeep Cut85points
- Walk rateDeep Cut85points
- Walking asymmetryDeep Cut85points
- Wall-plug efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- War scoreDeep Cut85points
- War supportDeep Cut85points
- Waste factorDeep Cut85points
- Wasted vote shareDeep Cut85points
- Wasting rateDeep Cut85points
- Water absorptionDeep Cut85points
- Water access rateDeep Cut85points
- Water cutDeep Cut85points
- Water saturationDeep Cut85points
- Water stressDeep Cut85points
- Water vaporDeep Cut85points
- Wealth share of the top 1%Deep Cut85points
- Wealth taxDeep Cut85points
- Weaning percentageDeep Cut85points
- Wear leveling countDeep Cut85points
- Weed controlDeep Cut85points
- Weed coverDeep Cut85points
- Weed seed percentageDeep Cut85points
- Weight distributionDeep Cut85points
- Weight-bearing percentageDeep Cut85points
- Weight/volume percentDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Points fall as more players choose the same entry, so the reveal reads as a map of consensus rather than a test of knowledge. Broad, instantly reachable measures sit at the bottom of the top band: 300 recorded answers earned 60 points, meaning plenty of people converged on the same handful of headline figures. A vast middle tier of 1836 answers earned 85, and that list shows what separates it from the floor: precision inside a field rather than celebrity. Entries such as a mutual fund distribution charge (12b-1 fee, 85), a short-term euro area lending benchmark (€STR, 85) or a post-procedure death rate (30-day mortality, 85) are professional terms rather than general knowledge, yet still familiar enough to be shared by a few players. Abandonment rate (85) lands in the same tier for the same reason. The lone 100-point entry, Albedo, was matched by nobody else, which is the lesson: the summit belongs to one narrow technical reading of the prompt that no rival tried.