Krillion Recorded answers
2,242 recorded answers
How to approach it
Sweep disciplines one at a time instead of chasing synonyms for the clue in brackets, since breadth is what pays. The productive question is which standard figure in a given trade is habitually written with a percent sign and not as a fraction, a decimal or a count. Money, clinical research, sports analytics, farming, factory quality and social surveys each hold long tails of such measures, and the tail is where the points sit. Inside a chosen field, drill from the obvious headline number down to the specialist variants that practitioners quote and outsiders never mention. Jot candidates in bulk before judging them: the middle band is crowded, and only unusual entries lift a solid list into a great one.
Get a hint
Begin with the professional vocabularies, because money, clinical research, engineering and sports analytics each keep a stock of figures quoted with a percent sign rather than as a plain fraction.
A little more
Then turn to social and household statistics, where coverage, participation, uptake and completion are almost always given as a share of a clearly defined population.
One step further
Finally probe narrow technical corners, where one specialised ratio, loss or content figure is second nature inside a trade and practically unknown beyond it.
Reveal answers 2,242
- Weighted average cost of capitalDeep Cut85points
- Weighting efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- Wet/dry mixDeep Cut85points
- Whiff rateDeep Cut85points
- White blood cell differentialDeep Cut85points
- Whole grain percentageDeep Cut85points
- Williams %RDeep Cut85points
- Wind and solar shareDeep Cut85points
- Wind shareDeep Cut85points
- Wind turbine efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- Windfall taxDeep Cut85points
- Window-to-wall ratioDeep Cut85points
- WithholdingDeep Cut85points
- Women in parliamentDeep Cut85points
- Word error rateDeep Cut85points
- Word recognition scoreDeep Cut85points
- Workers' compensation benefit rateDeep Cut85points
- Wow and flutterDeep Cut85points
- Wrap feeDeep Cut85points
- Wrongful conviction rateDeep Cut85points
- XP boostDeep Cut85points
- Year-over-year growthDeep Cut85points
- Year-to-date returnDeep Cut85points
- Yield (cooking)Deep Cut85points
- Yield gapDeep Cut85points
- Yield on costDeep Cut85points
- Yield rateDeep Cut85points
- Yield to callDeep Cut85points
- Yield to maturityDeep Cut85points
- Yield to worstDeep Cut85points
- Youth unemployment rateDeep Cut85points
- ZakatDeep Cut85points
- Zebra levelDeep Cut85points
- Zone contact rateDeep Cut85points
- Zone coverage rateDeep Cut85points
- Zone rateDeep Cut85points
- Zone swing rateDeep Cut85points
- 401(k) contributionRare60points
- 401(k) matchRare60points
- A1CRare60points
- Acceptance rateRare60points
- AccuracyRare60points
- Achievement percentageRare60points
- Ancestry percentageRare60points
- Annual returnRare60points
- Approval ratingRare60points
- APYRare60points
- AttendanceRare60points
- Battery healthRare60points
- Birth control effectivenessRare60points
Why these answers count
Points fall as more players choose the same entry, so the reveal reads as a map of consensus rather than a test of knowledge. Broad, instantly reachable measures sit at the bottom of the top band: 300 recorded answers earned 60 points, meaning plenty of people converged on the same handful of headline figures. A vast middle tier of 1836 answers earned 85, and that list shows what separates it from the floor: precision inside a field rather than celebrity. Entries such as a mutual fund distribution charge (12b-1 fee, 85), a short-term euro area lending benchmark (€STR, 85) or a post-procedure death rate (30-day mortality, 85) are professional terms rather than general knowledge, yet still familiar enough to be shared by a few players. Abandonment rate (85) lands in the same tier for the same reason. The lone 100-point entry, Albedo, was matched by nobody else, which is the lesson: the summit belongs to one narrow technical reading of the prompt that no rival tried.