Krillion Recorded answers
8,049 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat this as a memory-and-ranking exercise rather than a definitions test. First, list every tabletop design you can genuinely describe, from family staples and abstract classics to card-driven conflicts and economic simulations, because breadth sets your ceiling. Then sort the list by how many people worldwide could name the same title; the crowd-pleasers everyone remembers are the ones other respondents will also submit, so they pay least. Push toward items you know only from a specialist catalogue, a convention programme or a single play: regional editions, tiny print runs, series entries numbered in the dozens. Finally, test each entry against the definition, since a title without real strategic choice will not count, and copy the name exactly as the source spells it.
Get a hint
Nearly every published design qualifies, so the work is one of memory: sweep every shelf, club night and convention you have ever seen and note the titles that made you plan several moves ahead.
A little more
Move past mass-market shelves into specialist catalogues: small-press runs, imported editions, long-running series with dozens of numbered instalments and historical simulations reward the deepest memory.
One step further
The rarest picks live in the deep long tail: entries known only from hobby databases, many carrying a year and a colon in the title, odd punctuation at the front or a sparse abstract rule set.
Reveal answers 8,049
- Dark Passage: The Invasion of PakistanDeep Cut85points
- Dark SeasDeep Cut85points
- Dark Souls: The Board GameDeep Cut85points
- Dark Souls: The Card GameDeep Cut85points
- Dark TowerDeep Cut85points
- Dark WorldDeep Cut85points
- Darkest Dungeon: The Board GameDeep Cut85points
- Darkest NightDeep Cut85points
- DarkoverDeep Cut85points
- Darkrock VenturesDeep Cut85points
- DarterDeep Cut85points
- Darwin's ChoiceDeep Cut85points
- Darwin's JourneyDeep Cut85points
- DarwinautsDeep Cut85points
- Das AmulettDeep Cut85points
- Das BohnenspielDeep Cut85points
- Das Geheimnis der AbteiDeep Cut85points
- Das glorreiche ManöverDeep Cut85points
- Das Krokodil-SpielDeep Cut85points
- Das letzte ParadiesDeep Cut85points
- Das Prestel NasenspielDeep Cut85points
- Dash-gutiDeep Cut85points
- DauntlessDeep Cut85points
- Dawn of the Dead (board game)Deep Cut85points
- Dawn of the ZedsDeep Cut85points
- Dawn of UlosDeep Cut85points
- Day & NightDeep Cut85points
- Day of the Chariot: KadeshDeep Cut85points
- DaybreakDeep Cut85points
- Days of Decision IIDeep Cut85points
- Days of Ire: Budapest 1956Deep Cut85points
- Days of SteamDeep Cut85points
- Daytona 500Deep Cut85points
- Daytrader: A Financial Board GameDeep Cut85points
- DC Comics Deck-Building GameDeep Cut85points
- DC Deck-Building Game: Teen TitansDeep Cut85points
- DC Deck-Building Game: Teen Titans Go!Deep Cut85points
- De Ontembare StadDeep Cut85points
- De StijlDeep Cut85points
- De Vulgari EloquentiaDeep Cut85points
- Dead by Daylight: The Board GameDeep Cut85points
- Dead Cells: The Rogue-Lite Board GameDeep Cut85points
- Dead Men Tell No TalesDeep Cut85points
- Dead of Winter: The Long NightDeep Cut85points
- Dead of Winter: Warring ColoniesDeep Cut85points
- Dead ReckoningDeep Cut85points
- DeadwoodDeep Cut85points
- Deal with the DevilDeep Cut85points
- Deal: American DreamDeep Cut85points
- Dealer's ChoiceDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
Almost the entire field scored: of 7,473 recorded answers, 7,459 cleared sixty points, so the puzzle rewarded breadth of memory rather than luck. The single hundred-point entry, Rithmomachia, is a medieval arithmetic game that only a specialist would reach for, and it shows how far a genuinely obscure name can climb. The eighty-five-point band is dominated by hobby-catalogue depth: railway-economics titles such as 1830: Railways & Robber Barons, 1846: The Race for the Midwest and 18Chesapeake, alongside historical simulations like 1776 and 1812: The Invasion of Canada, all scored 85. The sixty-point tier held two hundred and twenty-four answers, recognisable designs that many respondents could name, which is precisely why they paid less. The pattern is blunt: the more players who can produce the same title, the smaller the reward, so the best move is the most specific published design you can honestly defend as a strategy game.