Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Building performanceDeep Cut85points
- Building scienceDeep Cut85points
- Building services engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Building surveyingDeep Cut85points
- Built environmentDeep Cut85points
- BulgarianDeep Cut85points
- BurmeseDeep Cut85points
- BuryatDeep Cut85points
- Business analysisDeep Cut85points
- Business and MarketsDeep Cut85points
- Business and technologyDeep Cut85points
- Business anthropologyDeep Cut85points
- Business artificial intelligenceDeep Cut85points
- Business communicationDeep Cut85points
- Business continuity managementDeep Cut85points
- Business developmentDeep Cut85points
- Business Economics and Public PolicyDeep Cut85points
- Business educationDeep Cut85points
- Business EnglishDeep Cut85points
- Business ethicsDeep Cut85points
- Business financeDeep Cut85points
- Business information technologyDeep Cut85points
- Business intelligenceDeep Cut85points
- Business journalismDeep Cut85points
- Business leadershipDeep Cut85points
- Business mathematicsDeep Cut85points
- Business of art and designDeep Cut85points
- Business of beauty and fragranceDeep Cut85points
- Business psychologyDeep Cut85points
- Business researchDeep Cut85points
- Business statisticsDeep Cut85points
- Business Technology ManagementDeep Cut85points
- Business, Energy, Environment and SustainabilityDeep Cut85points
- Business, Entrepreneurship, and OrganizationsDeep Cut85points
- Byzantine studiesDeep Cut85points
- CabinetmakingDeep Cut85points
- CalligraphyDeep Cut85points
- Canadian historyDeep Cut85points
- Canadian lawDeep Cut85points
- Canadian literatureDeep Cut85points
- Canadian politicsDeep Cut85points
- Canadian studiesDeep Cut85points
- Cancer registry managementDeep Cut85points
- Canine behaviourDeep Cut85points
- Cannabis businessDeep Cut85points
- Cannabis cultivationDeep Cut85points
- Cannabis scienceDeep Cut85points
- Canon lawDeep Cut85points
- Cantorial studiesDeep Cut85points
- Capital marketsDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.