Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Biotechnology engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Biotechnology lawDeep Cut85points
- Bioveterinary scienceDeep Cut85points
- Black music and cultureDeep Cut85points
- Black Sea studiesDeep Cut85points
- BlackfootDeep Cut85points
- BlacksmithingDeep Cut85points
- BlockchainDeep Cut85points
- Blood bank technologyDeep Cut85points
- Blood sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Bluegrass musicDeep Cut85points
- BoatbuildingDeep Cut85points
- BodoDeep Cut85points
- BoilermakingDeep Cut85points
- Book and Media StudiesDeep Cut85points
- Book artsDeep Cut85points
- Book conservationDeep Cut85points
- Book historyDeep Cut85points
- Book studiesDeep Cut85points
- BosnianDeep Cut85points
- BrahuiDeep Cut85points
- Brain and cognitive sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Brand designDeep Cut85points
- Brand managementDeep Cut85points
- BrandingDeep Cut85points
- Brass performanceDeep Cut85points
- Brazilian historyDeep Cut85points
- Brazilian Sign Language (Libras)Deep Cut85points
- Brazilian studiesDeep Cut85points
- Breast surgeryDeep Cut85points
- BretonDeep Cut85points
- BrewingDeep Cut85points
- Brewing and distillingDeep Cut85points
- Brewing engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Bridge engineeringDeep Cut85points
- British historyDeep Cut85points
- British Sign LanguageDeep Cut85points
- British Sign Language interpretingDeep Cut85points
- British studiesDeep Cut85points
- Broadcast engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Broadcast technologyDeep Cut85points
- Broadcasting and hostingDeep Cut85points
- Buddhism, Psychology and Mental HealthDeep Cut85points
- Buddhist studiesDeep Cut85points
- Budo studiesDeep Cut85points
- Building environment and energy engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Building historyDeep Cut85points
- Building information modellingDeep Cut85points
- Building inspectionDeep Cut85points
- Building maintenanceDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.