Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Chemical and physical biologyDeep Cut85points
- Chemical BiologyDeep Cut85points
- Chemical biology of cancerDeep Cut85points
- Chemical engineering metallurgyDeep Cut85points
- Chemical engineering technologyDeep Cut85points
- Chemical pathologyDeep Cut85points
- Chemical physicsDeep Cut85points
- Chemical Science and TechnologyDeep Cut85points
- Chemical systemsDeep Cut85points
- Chemical technologyDeep Cut85points
- CheminformaticsDeep Cut85points
- Chemistry and biologyDeep Cut85points
- Chemistry and Chemical BiologyDeep Cut85points
- Chemistry and physicsDeep Cut85points
- CherokeeDeep Cut85points
- Cherokee studiesDeep Cut85points
- ChichewaDeep Cut85points
- Child and adolescent psychiatryDeep Cut85points
- Child and family health nursingDeep Cut85points
- Child and youth careDeep Cut85points
- Child care managementDeep Cut85points
- Child lifeDeep Cut85points
- Child welfareDeep Cut85points
- Childhood and youth studiesDeep Cut85points
- Childhood practiceDeep Cut85points
- Childhood studiesDeep Cut85points
- Children's book illustrationDeep Cut85points
- Children's lawDeep Cut85points
- Children's literatureDeep Cut85points
- Children's ministryDeep Cut85points
- China and Asia-Pacific StudiesDeep Cut85points
- China studiesDeep Cut85points
- Chinese educationDeep Cut85points
- Chinese historyDeep Cut85points
- Chinese history and cultureDeep Cut85points
- Chinese lawDeep Cut85points
- Chinese literatureDeep Cut85points
- Chinese materia medicaDeep Cut85points
- Chinese medicine health preservationDeep Cut85points
- Chinese medicine orthopaedics and traumatologyDeep Cut85points
- Chinese medicine rehabilitationDeep Cut85points
- Chinese minority languages and literatureDeep Cut85points
- Chinese operaDeep Cut85points
- Chinese paintingDeep Cut85points
- Chinese traditional musicDeep Cut85points
- Chiropractic technologyDeep Cut85points
- Choral conductingDeep Cut85points
- Choral musicDeep Cut85points
- Christian archaeologyDeep Cut85points
- Christian counselingDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.