Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Christian ethicsDeep Cut85points
- Christian spiritualityDeep Cut85points
- Christian studiesDeep Cut85points
- Christianity and cultureDeep Cut85points
- Church administrationDeep Cut85points
- Church historyDeep Cut85points
- Church plantingDeep Cut85points
- ChuvashDeep Cut85points
- CimbalomDeep Cut85points
- Cinema and digital mediaDeep Cut85points
- Circular economyDeep Cut85points
- Circus artsDeep Cut85points
- City designDeep Cut85points
- Civic and economic thought and leadershipDeep Cut85points
- Civil and Environmental EngineeringDeep Cut85points
- Civil draftingDeep Cut85points
- Civil engineering technologyDeep Cut85points
- Civil lawDeep Cut85points
- Civil, environmental and sustainable engineeringDeep Cut85points
- ClarinetDeep Cut85points
- Classical and ancient Near Eastern studiesDeep Cut85points
- Classical and Near Eastern archaeologyDeep Cut85points
- Classical archaeologyDeep Cut85points
- Classical archaeology and ancient historyDeep Cut85points
- Classical art and archaeologyDeep Cut85points
- Classical Chinese philologyDeep Cut85points
- Classical humanitiesDeep Cut85points
- Classical languagesDeep Cut85points
- Classical liberal education and civic leadershipDeep Cut85points
- Clean energy engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Clean energy systemsDeep Cut85points
- Climate and meteorologyDeep Cut85points
- Climate and space sciences and engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Climate and sustainable growthDeep Cut85points
- Climate ChangeDeep Cut85points
- Climate change and societyDeep Cut85points
- Climate change finance and investmentDeep Cut85points
- Climate change lawDeep Cut85points
- Climate change managementDeep Cut85points
- Climate engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Climate financeDeep Cut85points
- Climate justiceDeep Cut85points
- Climate science and policyDeep Cut85points
- Climate system scienceDeep Cut85points
- Climate system science and engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Climate, environmental and urban policyDeep Cut85points
- Clinical anatomyDeep Cut85points
- Clinical and health informaticsDeep Cut85points
- Clinical and industrial drug developmentDeep Cut85points
- Clinical and translational sciencesDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.