Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Combat systems engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Combinatorics and optimizationDeep Cut85points
- Combined studiesDeep Cut85points
- Comics studiesDeep Cut85points
- Command and control systemsDeep Cut85points
- Commercial artDeep Cut85points
- Commercial danceDeep Cut85points
- Commercial divingDeep Cut85points
- Commercial engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Commercial musicDeep Cut85points
- Commercial photographyDeep Cut85points
- Commercial space operationsDeep Cut85points
- Commonwealth StudiesDeep Cut85points
- Communication and information sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Communication and leadershipDeep Cut85points
- Communication and Media IndustriesDeep Cut85points
- Communication arts and sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Communication arts educationDeep Cut85points
- Communication sciences and disordersDeep Cut85points
- Communication systemsDeep Cut85points
- Communication, culture and technologyDeep Cut85points
- Communication, culture, information and technologyDeep Cut85points
- Communication, health and life sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Communication, rhetoric, and digital mediaDeep Cut85points
- Communications and signal processingDeep Cut85points
- Communications managementDeep Cut85points
- Communications technologyDeep Cut85points
- Communications technology managementDeep Cut85points
- Community advocacy and social policyDeep Cut85points
- Community and economic developmentDeep Cut85points
- Community and environmental sociologyDeep Cut85points
- Community and global public healthDeep Cut85points
- Community and organizational developmentDeep Cut85points
- Community and regional developmentDeep Cut85points
- Community artDeep Cut85points
- Community college leadershipDeep Cut85points
- Community developmentDeep Cut85points
- Community development for ageingDeep Cut85points
- Community educationDeep Cut85points
- Community healthDeep Cut85points
- Community Health and Prevention ResearchDeep Cut85points
- Community justiceDeep Cut85points
- Community leadershipDeep Cut85points
- Community musicDeep Cut85points
- Community organizingDeep Cut85points
- Community psychologyDeep Cut85points
- Community resources and developmentDeep Cut85points
- Community scienceDeep Cut85points
- Community sports managementDeep Cut85points
- Community, environment and planningDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.