Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- ComorianDeep Cut85points
- Companion animal scienceDeep Cut85points
- Comparative American studiesDeep Cut85points
- Comparative and international educationDeep Cut85points
- Comparative biologyDeep Cut85points
- Comparative biomedical scienceDeep Cut85points
- Comparative cultural studiesDeep Cut85points
- Comparative culture and languageDeep Cut85points
- Comparative cultures and politicsDeep Cut85points
- Comparative educationDeep Cut85points
- Comparative ethnic studiesDeep Cut85points
- Comparative history of ideasDeep Cut85points
- Comparative lawDeep Cut85points
- Comparative media studiesDeep Cut85points
- Comparative medicineDeep Cut85points
- Comparative PoliticsDeep Cut85points
- Comparative psychologyDeep Cut85points
- Comparative public policyDeep Cut85points
- Comparative studiesDeep Cut85points
- Comparative Studies in Race and EthnicityDeep Cut85points
- Competition lawDeep Cut85points
- Complex adaptive systems scienceDeep Cut85points
- Complex systems scienceDeep Cut85points
- ComplianceDeep Cut85points
- Composite materialsDeep Cut85points
- Composite materials technologyDeep Cut85points
- Computation and cognitionDeep Cut85points
- Computation, cognition and languageDeep Cut85points
- Computational and applied mathematicsDeep Cut85points
- Computational and data scienceDeep Cut85points
- Computational Biology and Biomedical InformaticsDeep Cut85points
- Computational Chemistry and Chemical PhysicsDeep Cut85points
- Computational engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Computational epidemiology and systems modelingDeep Cut85points
- Computational financeDeep Cut85points
- Computational fluid dynamicsDeep Cut85points
- Computational life sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Computational linguisticsDeep Cut85points
- Computational mathematicsDeep Cut85points
- Computational mechanicsDeep Cut85points
- Computational mediaDeep Cut85points
- Computational methods for materials scienceDeep Cut85points
- Computational NeuroscienceDeep Cut85points
- Computational physicsDeep Cut85points
- Computational scienceDeep Cut85points
- Computational Science and EngineeringDeep Cut85points
- Computational social scienceDeep Cut85points
- Computational statisticsDeep Cut85points
- Computational systems biologyDeep Cut85points
- Computer and communication engineeringDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.