Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- EcoGastronomyDeep Cut85points
- Ecological anthropologyDeep Cut85points
- Ecological economicsDeep Cut85points
- Ecological engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Ecological management and restorationDeep Cut85points
- Ecology and conservation biologyDeep Cut85points
- Ecology and evolutionary biologyDeep Cut85points
- Economic developmentDeep Cut85points
- Economic geographyDeep Cut85points
- Economic geologyDeep Cut85points
- Economic historyDeep Cut85points
- Economic lawDeep Cut85points
- Economic modeling, AI, and data scienceDeep Cut85points
- Economic policyDeep Cut85points
- Economic psychologyDeep Cut85points
- Economic sociologyDeep Cut85points
- Economic statisticsDeep Cut85points
- Economics and businessDeep Cut85points
- Economics and computer scienceDeep Cut85points
- Economics and financeDeep Cut85points
- Economics and foreign languageDeep Cut85points
- Economics and managementDeep Cut85points
- Economics and mathematicsDeep Cut85points
- Economics educationDeep Cut85points
- Economics of educationDeep Cut85points
- Ecosystem management and administrationDeep Cut85points
- Ecosystem scienceDeep Cut85points
- EcotourismDeep Cut85points
- EcotoxicologyDeep Cut85points
- Ecumenical studiesDeep Cut85points
- EditingDeep Cut85points
- Education entrepreneurshipDeep Cut85points
- Education for health care professionalsDeep Cut85points
- Education for planetary futuresDeep Cut85points
- Education for social justiceDeep Cut85points
- Education policyDeep Cut85points
- Education policy and leadershipDeep Cut85points
- Education sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Education studiesDeep Cut85points
- Education, culture, and societyDeep Cut85points
- Education, development and community engagementDeep Cut85points
- Educational evaluationDeep Cut85points
- Educational leadershipDeep Cut85points
- Educational leadership and policy studiesDeep Cut85points
- Educational linguisticsDeep Cut85points
- Educational neuroscienceDeep Cut85points
- Educational policy and evaluationDeep Cut85points
- Educational researchDeep Cut85points
- Educational statisticsDeep Cut85points
- Educational supervisionDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.