Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Distance educationDeep Cut85points
- Distributed systemsDeep Cut85points
- Diversity, equity and inclusionDeep Cut85points
- DJingDeep Cut85points
- Documentary filmmakingDeep Cut85points
- Documentary photographyDeep Cut85points
- DogriDeep Cut85points
- Double bassDeep Cut85points
- Drama therapyDeep Cut85points
- Dramatic writingDeep Cut85points
- DramaturgyDeep Cut85points
- Dravidian studiesDeep Cut85points
- DravyagunaDeep Cut85points
- DrehuDeep Cut85points
- Drilling engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Driver and traffic safety educationDeep Cut85points
- Drug and alcohol studiesDeep Cut85points
- Drug developmentDeep Cut85points
- Drug discoveryDeep Cut85points
- Drywall installationDeep Cut85points
- Dual languagesDeep Cut85points
- DzongkhaDeep Cut85points
- E-commerceDeep Cut85points
- Early childhood administrationDeep Cut85points
- Early childhood and family policyDeep Cut85points
- Early childhood special educationDeep Cut85points
- Early childhood studiesDeep Cut85points
- Early IrishDeep Cut85points
- Early modern historyDeep Cut85points
- Early modern studiesDeep Cut85points
- Earth and climate sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Earth and environmental engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Earth and environmental sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Earth and planetary sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Earth and space explorationDeep Cut85points
- Earth and space sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Earth science and engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Earth science educationDeep Cut85points
- Earth systems scienceDeep Cut85points
- Earth, atmospheric, and planetary sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Earth, climate and biologyDeep Cut85points
- Earth, society, and environmental sustainabilityDeep Cut85points
- Earthquake engineeringDeep Cut85points
- East Asian art historyDeep Cut85points
- East Asian languagesDeep Cut85points
- East Asian languages and civilizationsDeep Cut85points
- East Asian languages and literaturesDeep Cut85points
- Eastern classicsDeep Cut85points
- Eastern European studiesDeep Cut85points
- EcclesiologyDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.