Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Endocrine surgeryDeep Cut85points
- EndocrinologyDeep Cut85points
- Endocrinology and reproductive physiologyDeep Cut85points
- EndodonticsDeep Cut85points
- Energy and earth resourcesDeep Cut85points
- Energy and electrical vehicle engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Energy and mineral engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Energy and sustainability engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Energy economicsDeep Cut85points
- Energy engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Energy lawDeep Cut85points
- Energy managementDeep Cut85points
- Energy management technologyDeep Cut85points
- Energy policyDeep Cut85points
- Energy science and technologyDeep Cut85points
- Energy studiesDeep Cut85points
- Energy sustainabilityDeep Cut85points
- Energy systems installation and repair technologyDeep Cut85points
- Energy technologyDeep Cut85points
- Energy transition and efficiencyDeep Cut85points
- Energy, climate, and the environmentDeep Cut85points
- Energy, environmental, and food economicsDeep Cut85points
- Energy, society and sustainabilityDeep Cut85points
- Engineering and computational mechanicsDeep Cut85points
- Engineering and computing systemsDeep Cut85points
- Engineering at the nano-scaleDeep Cut85points
- Engineering chemistryDeep Cut85points
- Engineering cyberneticsDeep Cut85points
- Engineering educationDeep Cut85points
- Engineering for sustainable developmentDeep Cut85points
- Engineering fundamentalsDeep Cut85points
- Engineering informaticsDeep Cut85points
- Engineering mathematicsDeep Cut85points
- Engineering mechanicsDeep Cut85points
- Engineering psychologyDeep Cut85points
- Engineering scienceDeep Cut85points
- Engineering science and mechanicsDeep Cut85points
- Engineering technology and management for agricultural systemsDeep Cut85points
- Engineering technology managementDeep Cut85points
- Engineering, law, and policyDeep Cut85points
- English and Chinese translationDeep Cut85points
- English historyDeep Cut85points
- English linguisticsDeep Cut85points
- Enterprise architecture and business transformationDeep Cut85points
- Enterprise cybersecurity managementDeep Cut85points
- Enterprise risk managementDeep Cut85points
- Enterprise systems engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Entertainment and multimedia computingDeep Cut85points
- Entertainment businessDeep Cut85points
- Entertainment designDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.