Krillion Recorded answers
4,381 recorded answers
How to approach it
Treat the answer as a breadth test rather than a knowledge test: the scorer rewards distance from the middle of the distribution, so the goal is to generate volume first and refine second. Work through the academic map systematically, by faculty, then by department, then by the sub-specialisms inside each department, and keep a running list without judging entries. When a field dries up, mine the seams between disciplines, the professional and clinical training routes, and the titles that attach a place, a material or a technique to a discipline. Only after you have a long list should you cut the weakest entries. Save your single boldest, most niche pick for the moment you feel the list is running dry, because that is where the points live.
Get a hint
Begin with the widest possible sweep of post-secondary study: every faculty, school and department that confers a formal degree, and let the list run far past the handful of titles everyone knows.
A little more
Once the obvious fields are exhausted, push into the hybrid and vocational corners: programmes that fuse two disciplines into a single named degree, or that prepare students for one licensed trade.
One step further
Now go micro: titles tied to a single material, technique, instrument, region, species, patient group or single campus, often only a few words long and offered by just one institution.
Reveal answers 4,381
- Entertainment engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Entertainment lawDeep Cut85points
- Entertainment managementDeep Cut85points
- Entrepreneurial leadershipDeep Cut85points
- Entrepreneurship lawDeep Cut85points
- Environment and developmentDeep Cut85points
- Environment and information studiesDeep Cut85points
- Environment and natural resourcesDeep Cut85points
- Environment and resourcesDeep Cut85points
- Environment and societyDeep Cut85points
- Environment and sustainabilityDeep Cut85points
- Environment, culture and societyDeep Cut85points
- Environmental and forest sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Environmental and geographical scienceDeep Cut85points
- Environmental and occupational health sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Environmental and water resources engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Environmental and workplace preventionDeep Cut85points
- Environmental anthropologyDeep Cut85points
- Environmental assessmentDeep Cut85points
- Environmental biologyDeep Cut85points
- Environmental biotechnologyDeep Cut85points
- Environmental building designDeep Cut85points
- Environmental chemistryDeep Cut85points
- Environmental chemistry and technologyDeep Cut85points
- Environmental communicationDeep Cut85points
- Environmental conservationDeep Cut85points
- Environmental designDeep Cut85points
- Environmental design and sustainabilityDeep Cut85points
- Environmental earth and soil sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Environmental economicsDeep Cut85points
- Environmental economics and sustainable engineeringDeep Cut85points
- Environmental engineering technologyDeep Cut85points
- Environmental ethicsDeep Cut85points
- Environmental geographyDeep Cut85points
- Environmental geoscienceDeep Cut85points
- Environmental healthDeep Cut85points
- Environmental historyDeep Cut85points
- Environmental horticultureDeep Cut85points
- Environmental horticulture and urban forestryDeep Cut85points
- Environmental humanitiesDeep Cut85points
- Environmental informaticsDeep Cut85points
- Environmental journalismDeep Cut85points
- Environmental justiceDeep Cut85points
- Environmental life sciencesDeep Cut85points
- Environmental managementDeep Cut85points
- Environmental physicsDeep Cut85points
- Environmental planningDeep Cut85points
- Environmental psychologyDeep Cut85points
- Environmental remediation and managementDeep Cut85points
- Environmental resources engineeringDeep Cut85points
Why these answers count
The scoring here rewards specificity, and the reveal shows it plainly. Of the recorded answers, 4298 cleared sixty points, but only one reached the top: Bagpiping at 100, a title so narrow that few players would ever think of it. The 85-point band, 3803 answers deep, is where disciplined, specific thinking lands; entries such as Accelerator physics, Acoustics and music technology, Adult-gerontology nurse practitioner or Accounting information systems each fuse a subject with a qualifier, a population or a second field. The 60-point band, 494 answers, is thinner and holds titles closer to the centre of the distribution: real, respectable degrees whose names are broad enough that a large share of players reach them. Practical lesson: a plain discipline name is short and safe but cheap, a two-part hybrid name is the reliable workhorse, and the rare one-institution curiosity is the only route to a perfect score. Precision in naming, not obscurity of subject, separates the bands.